Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Higher integrability of solutions to elliptic equations under additional sign constraints

Stefan Schiffer

Abstract

Solutions to elliptic equations often exhibit higher regularity properties such as \emph{higher integrability}. That is, for instance, a solution $u$ to a system that a priori only satisfies $ u \in W^{1,r}$ is more regular and even in the Sobolev space $W^{1,s}$ for some $s>r$. Under additional constraints of the sign of specific terms such as $(\partial_i u)$ this improvement of regularity can be sharpened further. In this work, we consider two examples of such higher integrability results: First, we show a version of Müller's result on the higher integrability of the determinant for maps $u \in W^{1,n} $ such that $\mathrm{det}(\nabla u) \geq 0$ (or $ \mathrm{det}_-(\nabla u) \in L \log L$). Second, we consider (very weak) solutions to the $p$-Laplace equation that satisfy sign constraints for their partial derivatives, i.e. that $(\partial_i u)_- $ is of higher integrability than $(\partial_i u)_+$. To prove our results, we use the method of Lipschitz truncation; for the second example we further develop a variation of this technique, the \emph{asymmetric} Lipschitz truncation.

Higher integrability of solutions to elliptic equations under additional sign constraints

Abstract

Solutions to elliptic equations often exhibit higher regularity properties such as \emph{higher integrability}. That is, for instance, a solution to a system that a priori only satisfies is more regular and even in the Sobolev space for some . Under additional constraints of the sign of specific terms such as this improvement of regularity can be sharpened further. In this work, we consider two examples of such higher integrability results: First, we show a version of Müller's result on the higher integrability of the determinant for maps such that (or ). Second, we consider (very weak) solutions to the -Laplace equation that satisfy sign constraints for their partial derivatives, i.e. that is of higher integrability than . To prove our results, we use the method of Lipschitz truncation; for the second example we further develop a variation of this technique, the \emph{asymmetric} Lipschitz truncation.
Paper Structure (10 sections, 13 theorems, 115 equations, 1 figure)

This paper contains 10 sections, 13 theorems, 115 equations, 1 figure.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Suppose that $\alpha \geq -1$ and that Then $F_+(\nabla u) \cdot \log(1+ F_+(u))^{\alpha+1} \in L^1$.

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: Rough outline of the start of the staircase construction: The elliptic equation is seen as a differential inclusion, i.e as a pair $(\nabla u,\sigma)$ where $\mathop{\mathrm{div}}\nolimits \sigma=0$ and $\sigma= \vert \nabla u \vert^{p-2} \nabla u$. At the end of the construction (up to some small error), we obtain a pair $(\nabla u,\sigma)$ such that $(\nabla u(x),\sigma(x))$ is contained in the red points almost everywhere. For this staircase construction (which is based on rank-one connections) to work it is crucial that $\partial_1 u$ is allowed to have (unbounded) positive and negative values.

Theorems & Definitions (26)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Corollary 1.4
  • Theorem 2.1: Lipschitz truncation
  • Lemma 2.2
  • Definition 2.3
  • Remark 2.4
  • Definition 2.5
  • Lemma 2.6
  • ...and 16 more