Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Symmetric Iterations with Countable Support

Frank Gilson

TL;DR

This work addresses constructing models of $ZF$ in which the Axiom of Choice fails by developing a uniform framework for iterated symmetric extensions with countable support. The core idea combines direct-limit presentations at uncountable cofinalities and inverse-limit (tree) presentations at cofinality $\omega$, producing a normal $\omega_1$-complete limit filter that closes hereditarily symmetric names under countable tuples, thereby preserving $ZF$ (and, from a $ZFC$ ground, $DC$). The framework also extends to class-length iterations under definability assumptions, offering a reusable toolkit for building choiceless models with Dependent Choice. Collectively, this advances the methodology beyond finite-support approaches, enabling controlled failures of choice with robust foundational properties and broad applicability to set-length and class-length constructions.

Abstract

We develop a framework for iterated symmetric extensions with countable support. At limit stages of uncountable cofinality we use the direct-limit presentation; at limits of cofinality $ω$ we use a countable-support (inverse-limit) presentation via trees of conditions along a fixed cofinal sequence. We define the associated limit symmetry filter by head pushforwards and then (only at cf$(λ)=ω)$ closing under countable intersections in the minimal normal way, and we prove that the resulting limit filter is normal and $ω_1$--complete. This yields closure of hereditarily symmetric names under countable tuples and, consequently, preservation of ZF; in a ZFC ground model we also obtain DC in the resulting symmetric model. When the iteration template is first-order definable over a GBC ground with Global Choice and sufficient class-recursion, the same scheme extends to class-length iterations, with the final symmetric model obtained from class hereditarily symmetric names (rather than as a union of stage models).

Symmetric Iterations with Countable Support

TL;DR

This work addresses constructing models of in which the Axiom of Choice fails by developing a uniform framework for iterated symmetric extensions with countable support. The core idea combines direct-limit presentations at uncountable cofinalities and inverse-limit (tree) presentations at cofinality , producing a normal -complete limit filter that closes hereditarily symmetric names under countable tuples, thereby preserving (and, from a ground, ). The framework also extends to class-length iterations under definability assumptions, offering a reusable toolkit for building choiceless models with Dependent Choice. Collectively, this advances the methodology beyond finite-support approaches, enabling controlled failures of choice with robust foundational properties and broad applicability to set-length and class-length constructions.

Abstract

We develop a framework for iterated symmetric extensions with countable support. At limit stages of uncountable cofinality we use the direct-limit presentation; at limits of cofinality we use a countable-support (inverse-limit) presentation via trees of conditions along a fixed cofinal sequence. We define the associated limit symmetry filter by head pushforwards and then (only at cf closing under countable intersections in the minimal normal way, and we prove that the resulting limit filter is normal and --complete. This yields closure of hereditarily symmetric names under countable tuples and, consequently, preservation of ZF; in a ZFC ground model we also obtain DC in the resulting symmetric model. When the iteration template is first-order definable over a GBC ground with Global Choice and sufficient class-recursion, the same scheme extends to class-length iterations, with the final symmetric model obtained from class hereditarily symmetric names (rather than as a union of stage models).
Paper Structure (23 sections, 8 theorems, 28 equations)

This paper contains 23 sections, 8 theorems, 28 equations.

Key Result

Lemma 3.9

Let $\pi:\mathcal{G}\to\mathcal{H}$ be a homomorphism and let $\mathcal{F}$ be a normal, $\omega_1$-complete filter on $\mathcal{H}$. Define the pullback filter on $\mathcal{G}$ by Then $\pi^{*}\mathcal{F}$ is a normal, $\omega_1$-complete filter on $\mathcal{G}$. Moreover, if $\iota:\mathcal{H}\hookrightarrow\mathcal{G}$ is an inclusion and $\mathcal{F}$ is a normal, $\omega_1$-complete filter o

Theorems & Definitions (44)

  • Remark 2.1: Metatheory vs. Object theory
  • Definition 2.2: Symmetric System
  • Remark 2.3: Tenacity and excellent supports; compatibility with karagila2019
  • Definition 2.5: Hereditarily Symmetric Name
  • Definition 2.6: Dependent Choice DC-mu
  • Remark 2.7: Limit-stage bookkeeping
  • Definition 3.1: Countable Support Symmetric Iteration
  • Remark 3.2: Relation to Karagila's finite-support framework
  • Remark 3.3: Direct limits preserve omega1-completeness at uncountable cofinality
  • Remark 3.4: Key Properties to Verify
  • ...and 34 more