Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Algebraic functional equation for big Galois representations over multiple $\mathbb{Z}_p$-extensions

Zeping Hao, Meng Fai Lim

TL;DR

The paper develops a unifying axiomatic framework for proving algebraic functional equations for big Galois representations over multi-$ abla Z_p$-extensions, encompassing Selmer groups and Nekovář Selmer complexes. It introduces a datum $(T, igl"{T_v}igr brace_{v|p})_{R,F}$ with conditions (C1)-(C4) and (R1)-(R2) and proves that the Greenberg Selmer groups and Selmer complexes satisfy a two-sided functional-equation-type relation, including a pseudo-isomorphism of torsion parts and equality of characteristic ideals under finite generation. The results unify and generalize numerous arithmetic cases (Hida families, Rankin–Selberg, triple products, half-ordinary deformations) and provide tools to realize algebraic functional equations beyond cyclotomic extensions, resolving prior gaps and extending Greenberg’s questions. Applications cover abelian varieties, modular forms, and their $p$-adic $L$-functions, offering a broad, multi-variable Iwasawa-theoretic perspective on algebraic functional equations.

Abstract

We present a general approach to establish algebraic functional equations for big Galois representations over multiple $\mathbb{Z}_p$-extensions. Our result is formulated in both Selmer group and Selmer complex settings, and encompasses a broad range of Iwasawa-theoretic scenarios. In particular, our result applies to the triple product of Hida families in both balanced and unbalanced cases, as well as the half-ordinary Rankin-Selberg universal deformations recently studied by the first named author and Loeffler. Our result also significantly generalizes many previously known cases of algebraic functional equations and answers a question of Greenberg.

Algebraic functional equation for big Galois representations over multiple $\mathbb{Z}_p$-extensions

TL;DR

The paper develops a unifying axiomatic framework for proving algebraic functional equations for big Galois representations over multi--extensions, encompassing Selmer groups and Nekovář Selmer complexes. It introduces a datum with conditions (C1)-(C4) and (R1)-(R2) and proves that the Greenberg Selmer groups and Selmer complexes satisfy a two-sided functional-equation-type relation, including a pseudo-isomorphism of torsion parts and equality of characteristic ideals under finite generation. The results unify and generalize numerous arithmetic cases (Hida families, Rankin–Selberg, triple products, half-ordinary deformations) and provide tools to realize algebraic functional equations beyond cyclotomic extensions, resolving prior gaps and extending Greenberg’s questions. Applications cover abelian varieties, modular forms, and their -adic -functions, offering a broad, multi-variable Iwasawa-theoretic perspective on algebraic functional equations.

Abstract

We present a general approach to establish algebraic functional equations for big Galois representations over multiple -extensions. Our result is formulated in both Selmer group and Selmer complex settings, and encompasses a broad range of Iwasawa-theoretic scenarios. In particular, our result applies to the triple product of Hida families in both balanced and unbalanced cases, as well as the half-ordinary Rankin-Selberg universal deformations recently studied by the first named author and Loeffler. Our result also significantly generalizes many previously known cases of algebraic functional equations and answers a question of Greenberg.
Paper Structure (14 sections, 28 theorems, 124 equations)

This paper contains 14 sections, 28 theorems, 124 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Suppose that $R=\mathcal{O}$ and that our datum $(T, \{T_v\}_{v|p})_{\mathcal{O},F}$ satisfies (C1)-(C4), (R1) and (R2). Write $\Gamma=\mathop{\mathrm{Gal}}\nolimits(F_\mathrm{cyc}/F)$. Then $X_{Gr}(A/F_\mathrm{cyc})$ and $X_{Gr}(A^*/F_\mathrm{cyc})$ have the same $\mathcal{O}\llbracket \Gamma \rrbr of $\mathcal{O}\llbracket \Gamma \rrbracket$-modules.

Theorems & Definitions (57)

  • Theorem 1.1: Theorem \ref{['main thm0']}
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3: Theorem \ref{['main thm0 Selcomplex']}
  • Theorem 1.4: Theorem \ref{['main thm Selcomplex']}
  • Lemma 2.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • Definition 2.3
  • Lemma 2.4
  • ...and 47 more