Fine-Grained Human Pose Editing Assessment via Layer-Selective MLLMs
Ningyu Sun, Zhaolin Cai, Zitong Xu, Peihang Chen, Huiyu Duan, Yichao Yan, Xiongkuo Min, Xiaokang Yang
TL;DR
This work tackles the evaluation gap in text-guided human pose editing by introducing HPE-Bench, a fine-grained benchmark with $1{,}700$ samples from $17$ editing models and accompanying authenticity and quality annotations. It then presents a unified framework built on layer-selective multimodal LLMs, combining contrastive LoRA tuning and Layer Sensitivity Analysis to identify the optimal feature layer for joint authenticity detection and multi-dimensional quality regression. The method achieves state-of-the-art performance in both forensic detection and perceptual quality prediction, with strong alignment to human judgments and reliable model ranking. By linking forensic traces with perceptual quality through a shared representation, the approach offers a practical benchmark and a robust evaluation tool for advancing reliable pose-editing technologies.
Abstract
Text-guided human pose editing has gained significant traction in AIGC applications. However,it remains plagued by structural anomalies and generative artifacts. Existing evaluation metrics often isolate authenticity detection from quality assessment, failing to provide fine-grained insights into pose-specific inconsistencies. To address these limitations, we introduce HPE-Bench, a specialized benchmark comprising 1,700 standardized samples from 17 state-of-the-art editing models, offering both authenticity labels and multi-dimensional quality scores. Furthermore, we propose a unified framework based on layer-selective multimodal large language models (MLLMs). By employing contrastive LoRA tuning and a novel layer sensitivity analysis (LSA) mechanism, we identify the optimal feature layer for pose evaluation. Our framework achieves superior performance in both authenticity detection and multi-dimensional quality regression, effectively bridging the gap between forensic detection and quality assessment.
