EmplifAI: a Fine-grained Dataset for Japanese Empathetic Medical Dialogues in 28 Emotion Labels
Wan Jou She, Lis Kanashiro Pereira, Fei Cheng, Sakiko Yahata, Panote Siriaraya, Eiji Aramaki
TL;DR
EmplifAI introduces a Japanese empathetic dialogue dataset tailored to chronic medical condition management, grounded in 28 fine-grained emotions adapted from GoEmotions. The dataset comprises 280 situation anchors and 4,125 two-turn dialogues, created via crowdsourcing with expert review and filtered for empathetic toxicity. The authors validate the emotion taxonomy with reverse-engineering using multiple LLMs and demonstrate that fine-tuning a Japanese LLM on EmplifAI improves fluency and emotion-specific empathy, while also exploring LLM-as-a-Judge for evaluation and comparing it to human judgments. The work highlights practical implications for patient-facing AI in low-resource languages and discusses safety, harms, and the limits of LLM-based evaluation in empathetic contexts.
Abstract
This paper introduces EmplifAI, a Japanese empathetic dialogue dataset designed to support patients coping with chronic medical conditions. They often experience a wide range of positive and negative emotions (e.g., hope and despair) that shift across different stages of disease management. EmplifAI addresses this complexity by providing situation-based dialogues grounded in 28 fine-grained emotion categories, adapted and validated from the GoEmotions taxonomy. The dataset includes 280 medically contextualized situations and 4125 two-turn dialogues, collected through crowdsourcing and expert review. To evaluate emotional alignment in empathetic dialogues, we assessed model predictions on situation--dialogue pairs using BERTScore across multiple large language models (LLMs), achieving F1 scores of 0.83. Fine-tuning a baseline Japanese LLM (LLM-jp-3.1-13b-instruct4) with EmplifAI resulted in notable improvements in fluency, general empathy, and emotion-specific empathy. Furthermore, we compared the scores assigned by LLM-as-a-Judge and human raters on dialogues generated by multiple LLMs to validate our evaluation pipeline and discuss the insights and potential risks derived from the correlation analysis.
