Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A Control Theoretic Approach to Decentralized AI Economy Stabilization via Dynamic Buyback-and-Burn Mechanisms

Zehua Cheng, Wei Dai, Zhipeng Wang, Rui Sun, Nick Wen, Jiahao Sun

TL;DR

This paper addresses the volatility of native tokens in decentralized AI networks by introducing the Dynamic-Control Buyback Mechanism (DCBM), a control-theoretic framework that uses a solvency-constrained Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) controller to regulate buybacks and burns. It formalizes the economy as a discrete-time dynamical system with a CPMM-based plant and a treasury that must remain solvent, then demonstrates stability, asymptotic solvency, and adversarial robustness through theoretical analysis and extensive agent-based Jump-Diffusion simulations. Key contributions include a formal problem formulation, a fixed-point, on-chain implementation of a PID controller with integral windup protection and a sigmoid actuator, and comprehensive evaluation showing reduced price volatility by ~66% and lower operator churn from 19.5% to 8.1% in high-volatility regimes, along with robustness insights under MEV-style attacks. The findings suggest that replacing static tokenomics with continuous, constraint-aware control loops enables secure, sustainable decentralized AI networks with improved treasury health and resilience against adversarial dynamics.

Abstract

The democratization of artificial intelligence through decentralized networks represents a paradigm shift in computational provisioning, yet the long-term viability of these ecosystems is critically endangered by the extreme volatility of their native economic layers. Current tokenomic models, which predominantly rely on static or threshold-based buyback heuristics, are ill-equipped to handle complex system dynamics and often function pro-cyclically, exacerbating instability during market downturns. To bridge this gap, we propose the Dynamic-Control Buyback Mechanism (DCBM), a formalized control-theoretic framework that utilizes a Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) controller with strict solvency constraints to regulate the token economy as a dynamical system. Extensive agent-based simulations utilizing Jump-Diffusion processes demonstrate that DCBM fundamentally outperforms static baselines, reducing token price volatility by approximately 66% and lowering operator churn from 19.5% to 8.1% in high-volatility regimes. These findings establish that converting tokenomics from static rules into continuous, structurally constrained control loops is a necessary condition for secure and sustainable decentralized intelligence networks.

A Control Theoretic Approach to Decentralized AI Economy Stabilization via Dynamic Buyback-and-Burn Mechanisms

TL;DR

This paper addresses the volatility of native tokens in decentralized AI networks by introducing the Dynamic-Control Buyback Mechanism (DCBM), a control-theoretic framework that uses a solvency-constrained Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) controller to regulate buybacks and burns. It formalizes the economy as a discrete-time dynamical system with a CPMM-based plant and a treasury that must remain solvent, then demonstrates stability, asymptotic solvency, and adversarial robustness through theoretical analysis and extensive agent-based Jump-Diffusion simulations. Key contributions include a formal problem formulation, a fixed-point, on-chain implementation of a PID controller with integral windup protection and a sigmoid actuator, and comprehensive evaluation showing reduced price volatility by ~66% and lower operator churn from 19.5% to 8.1% in high-volatility regimes, along with robustness insights under MEV-style attacks. The findings suggest that replacing static tokenomics with continuous, constraint-aware control loops enables secure, sustainable decentralized AI networks with improved treasury health and resilience against adversarial dynamics.

Abstract

The democratization of artificial intelligence through decentralized networks represents a paradigm shift in computational provisioning, yet the long-term viability of these ecosystems is critically endangered by the extreme volatility of their native economic layers. Current tokenomic models, which predominantly rely on static or threshold-based buyback heuristics, are ill-equipped to handle complex system dynamics and often function pro-cyclically, exacerbating instability during market downturns. To bridge this gap, we propose the Dynamic-Control Buyback Mechanism (DCBM), a formalized control-theoretic framework that utilizes a Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) controller with strict solvency constraints to regulate the token economy as a dynamical system. Extensive agent-based simulations utilizing Jump-Diffusion processes demonstrate that DCBM fundamentally outperforms static baselines, reducing token price volatility by approximately 66% and lowering operator churn from 19.5% to 8.1% in high-volatility regimes. These findings establish that converting tokenomics from static rules into continuous, structurally constrained control loops is a necessary condition for secure and sustainable decentralized intelligence networks.
Paper Structure (28 sections, 3 theorems, 16 equations, 2 figures, 3 tables)

This paper contains 28 sections, 3 theorems, 16 equations, 2 figures, 3 tables.

Key Result

Proposition 3.1

Given an initial treasury $T_0 > 0$ and parameter $\gamma \in (0,1)$, the treasury balance $T_k$ remains strictly positive for all finite $k$, regardless of the magnitude or duration of revenue collapse ($R_k = 0$).

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: Closed-loop control architecture of the Dynamic-Control Buyback Mechanism (DCBM). The schematic illustrates the feedback loop designed to stabilize the decentralized AI economy. a, The Error Interface computes the logarithmic deviation ($e_k$) between the target Time-Weighted Average Price (TWAP) and the real-time Spot Price. b, The PID Controller processes this error, applying proportional, integral (clamped), and derivative gains to calculate a raw intervention intensity ($u_k$). c, The Solvency Actuator functions as a critical safety valve, strictly bounding the physical buyback expenditure ($J_k$) by the current Treasury Balance ($T_k$) and the circuit breaker parameter ($\gamma$), ensuring asymptotic solvency regardless of market conditions. d, The AMM Plant represents the market environment where the buy-and-burn action is executed, altering the token price state for the subsequent control epoch ($k+1$).
  • Figure 2: Schematic representation of baseline stabilization mechanisms. The diagram illustrates the five control strategies evaluated against the proposed DCBM: (1) No Buyback, where fees are fully distributed to operators without burning; (2) Fixed-Rate Buyback, which applies a static percentage burn (e.g., 50%) regardless of market state; (3) Threshold Buyback, a heuristic approach triggering buybacks only when spot price $P_t$ falls below the moving average $P_{MA,t}$; (4) Model Predictive Control (MPC), which minimizes predicted error over a finite horizon; and (5) Reinforcement Learning (PPO), utilizing a neural policy to maximize a reward function based on stability and control effort.

Theorems & Definitions (3)

  • Proposition 3.1: Asymptotic Solvency
  • Theorem 4.1: Gain Sensitivity
  • Theorem 4.2: Non-Depletion