Table of Contents
Fetching ...

The Galois Structure of the Spaces of polydifferentials on the Drinfeld Curve

Denver-James Logan Marchment, Bernhard Köck

TL;DR

We address the modular representation problem for the action of ${G=SL_2({\bf F}_q)}$ on the space ${H^0(C,\Omega_C^{\otimes m})}$ of holomorphic polydifferentials on the Drinfeld curve ${C}$ in characteristic ${p}$ with ${p\mid |G|}$. The authors construct an explicit basis ${\omega_{ij}}$ for all ${q=p^r}$ and obtain a partial ${\mathbb F}[G]$-decomposition for general ${q}$, culminating in a complete indecomposable decomposition when ${q=p}$ using Green correspondence with the subgroup ${B}$ of upper-triangular matrices. They provide precise multiplicities for the ${\mathbb F}[B]$-decomposition ${\rm Res}^G_B(H^0(C,\Omega_C^{\otimes m}))$ and lift these to the full ${\mathbb F}[G]$-decomposition, giving explicit formulas for the numbers ${n_{a,b}}$ and ${n_i}$ via ramification data and Euler characteristics. The results advance understanding of the Galois structure of polydifferentials on a central Drinfeld curve and have potential implications for modular representation theory in geometric settings. $H^0(C,\Omega_C^{\otimes m})$ here denotes the space of globally holomorphic polydifferentials on the curve ${C}$, with basis elements built from ${\omega_{ij}}$ and organized by degree modulo ${q+1}$.

Abstract

Let $C$ be a smooth projective curve over an algebraically closed field ${\mathbb{F}}$ equipped with the action of a finite group $G$. When $p =\textrm{char}(\mathbb{F})$ divides the order of $G$, the long-standing problem of computing the induced representation of $G$ on the space $H^0(C,Ω^{\otimes m}_C)$ of globally holomorphic polydifferentials remains unsolved in general. In this paper, we study the case of the group $G = \mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb{F}_q)$ (where $q$ is a power of~$p$) acting on the Drinfeld curve $C$ which is the projective plane curve given by the equation $XY^q-X^qY-Z^{q+1} = 0$. When $q = p$, we fully decompose $H^0(C,Ω^{\otimes m}_C)$ as a direct sum of indecomposable $\mathbb{F}[G]$-modules. For arbitrary $q$, we give a partial decomposition in terms of an explicit $\mathbb{F}$-basis of $H^0(C,Ω^{\otimes m}_C)$.

The Galois Structure of the Spaces of polydifferentials on the Drinfeld Curve

TL;DR

We address the modular representation problem for the action of on the space of holomorphic polydifferentials on the Drinfeld curve in characteristic with . The authors construct an explicit basis for all and obtain a partial -decomposition for general , culminating in a complete indecomposable decomposition when using Green correspondence with the subgroup of upper-triangular matrices. They provide precise multiplicities for the -decomposition and lift these to the full -decomposition, giving explicit formulas for the numbers and via ramification data and Euler characteristics. The results advance understanding of the Galois structure of polydifferentials on a central Drinfeld curve and have potential implications for modular representation theory in geometric settings. here denotes the space of globally holomorphic polydifferentials on the curve , with basis elements built from and organized by degree modulo .

Abstract

Let be a smooth projective curve over an algebraically closed field equipped with the action of a finite group . When divides the order of , the long-standing problem of computing the induced representation of on the space of globally holomorphic polydifferentials remains unsolved in general. In this paper, we study the case of the group (where is a power of~) acting on the Drinfeld curve which is the projective plane curve given by the equation . When , we fully decompose as a direct sum of indecomposable -modules. For arbitrary , we give a partial decomposition in terms of an explicit -basis of .
Paper Structure (7 sections, 31 theorems, 129 equations, 3 tables)

This paper contains 7 sections, 31 theorems, 129 equations, 3 tables.

Key Result

Proposition 2.1

The Drinfeld curve $C$ has genus ${g(C)=\frac{q(q-1)}{2}}$.

Theorems & Definitions (64)

  • Proposition 2.1
  • proof
  • Proposition 2.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.3
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.4: Reduction formula
  • proof
  • Definition 2.5
  • Proposition 2.6
  • ...and 54 more