The PROPER Approach to Proactivity: Benchmarking and Advancing Knowledge Gap Navigation
Kirandeep Kaur, Vinayak Gupta, Aditya Gupta, Chirag Shah
TL;DR
The paper reframes proactive AI assistance as an epistemic calibration problem, introducing Proper, a modular framework that separates knowledge-gap discovery (DGA) from response generation (RGA) and uses a post-hoc reranker to selectively activate implicit dimensions. Across medical, coding, and shopping domains, ProPer improves task utility over strong baselines and CoT prompting, with larger gains in uncertain or risk-laden tasks. The work contributes a clean formalization of interaction dimensions, a dimension-level supervision dataset (ProPerBench), and a practical, calibrated architecture that demonstrates stable benefits in single-turn and multi-turn interactions. Its implications reach beyond surface-level correctness to trust, timing, and user intent alignment in proactive assistants, pointing to future extensions in adaptive calibration, concept-grounded representations, and multimodal signals.
Abstract
Most language-based assistants follow a reactive ask-and-respond paradigm, requiring users to explicitly state their needs. As a result, relevant but unexpressed needs often go unmet. Existing proactive agents attempt to address this gap either by eliciting further clarification, preserving this burden, or by extrapolating future needs from context, often leading to unnecessary or mistimed interventions. We introduce ProPer, Proactivity-driven Personalized agents, a novel two-agent architecture consisting of a Dimension Generating Agent (DGA) and a Response Generating Agent (RGA). DGA, a fine-tuned LLM agent, leverages explicit user data to generate multiple implicit dimensions (latent aspects relevant to the user's task but not considered by the user) or knowledge gaps. These dimensions are selectively filtered using a reranker based on quality, diversity, and task relevance. RGA then balances explicit and implicit dimensions to tailor personalized responses with timely and proactive interventions. We evaluate ProPer across multiple domains using a structured, gap-aware rubric that measures coverage, initiative appropriateness, and intent alignment. Our results show that ProPer improves quality scores and win rates across all domains, achieving up to 84% gains in single-turn evaluation and consistent dominance in multi-turn interactions.
