Interprofessional and Agile Development of Mobirobot: A Socially Assistive Robot for Pediatric Therapy Across Clinical and Therapeutic Settings
Leonie Dyck, Aiko Galetzka, Maximilian Noller, Anna-Lena Rinke, Jutta Bormann, Jekaterina Miller, Michelle Hochbaum, Julia Siemann, Jördis Alboth, Andre Berwinkel, Johanna Luz, Britta Kley-Zobel, Marcine Cyrys, Nora Flöttmann, Ariane Vogeler, Mariia Melnikova, Ira-Katharina Petras, Michael Siniatchkin, Winfried Barthlen, Anna-Lisa Vollmer
TL;DR
Mobirobot presents a multiprofessional, agilely developed socially assistive robot designed to support pediatric mobilization in both inpatient and outpatient settings for psychiatric and somatic therapy. Through an intensive co-development process with clinicians, therapists, and patients, the study demonstrates how a NAO6-based robot can deliver adaptable HIIT-like exercise regimes, motivational dialogue, and no-code system feedback while integrating into real-world clinical workflows. Early findings highlight improvements in engagement and the importance of context-aware design, robustness, and minimal intrusion, though challenges in sensor capability, long-term engagement, and recruitment remain. The work offers practical design principles and a scalable platform for future health-tech interventions in paediatric rehabilitation and mental health care.
Abstract
Introduction: Socially assistive robots hold promise for enhancing therapeutic engagement in paediatric clinical settings. However, their successful implementation requires not only technical robustness but also context-sensitive, co-designed solutions. This paper presents Mobirobot, a socially assistive robot developed to support mobilisation in children recovering from trauma, fractures, or depressive disorders through personalised exercise programmes. Methods: An agile, human-centred development approach guided the iterative design of Mobirobot. Multidisciplinary clinical teams and end users were involved throughout the co-development process, which focused on early integration into real-world paediatric surgical and psychiatric settings. The robot, based on the NAO platform, features a simple setup, adaptable exercise routines with interactive guidance, motivational dialogue, and a graphical user interface (GUI) for monitoring and no-code system feedback. Results: Deployment in hospital environments enabled the identification of key design requirements and usability constraints. Stakeholder feedback led to refinements in interaction design, movement capabilities, and technical configuration. A feasibility study is currently underway to assess acceptance, usability, and perceived therapeutic benefit, with data collection including questionnaires, behavioural observations, and staff-patient interviews. Discussion: Mobirobot demonstrates how multiprofessional, stakeholder-led development can yield a socially assistive system suited for dynamic inpatient settings. Early-stage findings underscore the importance of contextual integration, robustness, and minimal-intrusion design. While challenges such as sensor limitations and patient recruitment remain, the platform offers a promising foundation for further research and clinical application.
