Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Quantum graphs of homomorphisms

Andre Kornell, Bert Lindenhovius

TL;DR

The paper constructs the category $\mathsf{qGph}$ of quantum graphs from noncommutative geometry and defines a quantum graph $[G,H]$ of homomorphisms for each pair of quantum graphs. It proves that $\mathsf{qGph}$ is closed and that $[G,H]$ satisfies a universal property analogous to evaluation, with a crucial equivalence: finite graphs $G,H$ admit a winning quantum strategy in the $(G,H)$-homomorphism game iff $[G,H]$ is nonempty, linking quantum homomorphisms to nonlocal games. The approach unifies quantum function spaces (via quantum sets and relations) with quantum strategies for nonlocal games, and shows that morphisms in $\mathsf{qGph}$ correspond to trace-nonincreasing CP maps adjoint to unital $*$-homomorphisms, interpreting reflexive quantum relations as confusability graphs of quantum channels. The results illuminate a deep interaction between noncommutative geometry, quantum information, and graph homomorphisms, and provide a framework where classical and quantum homomorphisms are treated uniformly within a closed monoidal setting.

Abstract

We introduce a category $\mathsf{qGph}$ of quantum graphs, whose definition is motivated entirely from noncommutative geometry. For all quantum graphs $G$ and $H$ in $\mathsf{qGph}$, we then construct a quantum graph $[G,H]$ of homomorphisms from $G$ to $H$, making $\mathsf{qGph}$ a closed symmetric monoidal category. We prove that for all finite graphs $G$ and $H$, the quantum graph $[G,H]$ is nonempty iff the $(G,H)$-homomorphism game has a winning quantum strategy, directly generalizing the classical case. The finite quantum graphs in $\mathsf{qGph}$ are tracial, real, and self-adjoint, and the morphisms between them are CP morphisms that are adjoint to a unital $*$-homomorphism. We show that Weaver's two notions of a CP morphism coincide in this context. We also show that every finite reflexive quantum graph is the confusability quantum graph of a quantum channel, answering a question of Daws.

Quantum graphs of homomorphisms

TL;DR

The paper constructs the category of quantum graphs from noncommutative geometry and defines a quantum graph of homomorphisms for each pair of quantum graphs. It proves that is closed and that satisfies a universal property analogous to evaluation, with a crucial equivalence: finite graphs admit a winning quantum strategy in the -homomorphism game iff is nonempty, linking quantum homomorphisms to nonlocal games. The approach unifies quantum function spaces (via quantum sets and relations) with quantum strategies for nonlocal games, and shows that morphisms in correspond to trace-nonincreasing CP maps adjoint to unital -homomorphisms, interpreting reflexive quantum relations as confusability graphs of quantum channels. The results illuminate a deep interaction between noncommutative geometry, quantum information, and graph homomorphisms, and provide a framework where classical and quantum homomorphisms are treated uniformly within a closed monoidal setting.

Abstract

We introduce a category of quantum graphs, whose definition is motivated entirely from noncommutative geometry. For all quantum graphs and in , we then construct a quantum graph of homomorphisms from to , making a closed symmetric monoidal category. We prove that for all finite graphs and , the quantum graph is nonempty iff the -homomorphism game has a winning quantum strategy, directly generalizing the classical case. The finite quantum graphs in are tracial, real, and self-adjoint, and the morphisms between them are CP morphisms that are adjoint to a unital -homomorphism. We show that Weaver's two notions of a CP morphism coincide in this context. We also show that every finite reflexive quantum graph is the confusability quantum graph of a quantum channel, answering a question of Daws.
Paper Structure (10 sections, 17 theorems, 69 equations)

This paper contains 10 sections, 17 theorems, 69 equations.

Key Result

Lemma 3.2

Let $G$ and $H$ be quantum graphs, and let $\Phi:\mathcal{V}_G \to \mathcal{V}_H$ be a function. The following are equivalent:

Theorems & Definitions (47)

  • Definition 3.1
  • Lemma 3.2
  • proof
  • Definition 3.3
  • Definition 3.4
  • Theorem 3.5
  • proof
  • Corollary 3.6
  • Remark 3.7
  • Proposition 4.1
  • ...and 37 more