Comparison of plasma response models for RMP effects on the divertor and scrape-off layer in KSTAR
H. Frerichs, J. Van Blarcum, T. Cote, S. K. Kim, Y. Q. Liu, S. M. Yang
TL;DR
This work addresses how resonant magnetic perturbations create helical footprints in the scrape-off layer and divertor of a KSTAR H-mode plasma, and how different plasma-response models alter predictions. Using FLARE to compute footprints based on GPEC, MARS-F, M3D-C1, and JOREK, coupled to EMC3-EIRENE for heat-load predictions, the authors find footprint sizes $S$ spanning from about $2\,$cm to $14\,$cm across models. The heat-load predictions generally overestimate measured striations, though the smallest footprints combined with lower SOL power or higher upstream density and radiative losses improve agreement, with M3D-C1 giving the closest match in several scans. The results underscore the importance of boundary treatment near the separatrix and motivate self-consistent free-boundary benchmarking (e.g., JOREK-STARWALL) and better constraints on separatrix density and impurity radiation for improved predictive capability.
Abstract
Resonant magnetic perturbations (RMPs) are beneficial for control of edge localized modes (ELMs) in tokamaks. Nevertheless, a side effect is the appearance of a helical striations in the particle and heat loads onto divertor targets. The extent and field line connection of these striations is significantly altered by the plasma response to external perturbations. For an ELM suppressed H-mode plasma at KSTAR, magnetic footprints are computed by FLARE based on plasma response from GPEC, MARS-F, M3D-C1 and JOREK with substantial differences in the resulting footprints (from 2 cm to 14 cm). This is reflected in EMC3-EIRENE simulations of the resulting heat loads: it is found that either the peak value or the extent of the striations appear to be overestimated compared to IRTV measurements. Reasonable agreement can only be achieved for the smallest footprint for lower input power and lower cross-field transport, or for higher upstream density and radiative power losses.
