Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Implications of Breuil-Herzig-Hu-Morra-Schraen's conjectures on Zábrádi's functor

Nataniel Marquis

TL;DR

The paper investigates whether Zábrádi's functor $\mathbf{V}_{\Delta}$ can recover the $(n-1)$-fold Galois data $\overline{L}^{\boxtimes}(\rho)$ from a GL$_n(\mathbb{Q}_p)$-representation $\Pi$ that is compatible with a given $\rho$ in the Breuil–Herzig–Hu–Morra–Schraen framework. It develops a GL$_3$ toy case to expose structural obstructions: even under weak compatibility with $\widetilde{P}_{\rho}$, the image $\mathbf{V}_{\Delta}(\Pi)$ cannot equal $\overline{L}^{\boxtimes}(\rho)$ when $\rho$ is reducible and $n\ge 3$, due to mismatches in Jordan–Hölder data and finiteness properties of $\mathbf{V}_{\Delta}$. The work also establishes dimension bounds for $\mathbf{V}_{\Delta}(\Pi)$ in the toy case and proves that for irreducible $\rho$ there are infinitely many dimensions where no supersingular $\Pi$ yields the desired equality, highlighting fundamental obstructions to reconstructing $\overline{L}^{\boxtimes}(\rho)$ from $\Pi$ via $\mathbf{V}_{\Delta}$. Collectively, these results reveal pervasive limitations of Breuil–Herzig–Hu–Morra–Schraen-type conjectures when translated through Zábrádi’s functor, even in restricted or toy settings.

Abstract

Let $ρ$ be an $n$-dimensional representation of $\mathcal{G}_{\mathbb{Q}_p}$ over $\overline{\mathbb{F}_p}$. When $ρ$ is generic and a good conjugate, the article "Conjectures and results on modular representations of $\mathrm{GL}_n(K)$ for a $p$-adic field $K$", by Breuil-Herzig-Hu-Morra-Schraen, introduces the notion of compatibility with $ρ$ for an admissible representation of $\mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbb{Q}_p)$. In loc. cit., the five authors also question whether one could recover a representation of $\mathcal{G}_{\mathbb{Q}_p}^{n-1}$, called $\overline{L}^{\boxtimes}(ρ)$ and constructed from $ρ$, from some $Π$ compatible with $ρ$ by using Zábrádi's functor $\mathbf{V}_Δ$. We give a range of results, for an arbitrary $Π$ verifying some "weak" compatibilities with $ρ$, about how badly $\mathbf{V}_Δ(Π)$ behaves. In particular, when $ρ$ is reducible and $n\geq 3$, no $Π$ compatible with $P_ρ$ can verify $\mathbf{V}_Δ(Π)\simeq \overline{L}^{\boxtimes}(ρ)$.

Implications of Breuil-Herzig-Hu-Morra-Schraen's conjectures on Zábrádi's functor

TL;DR

The paper investigates whether Zábrádi's functor can recover the -fold Galois data from a GL-representation that is compatible with a given in the Breuil–Herzig–Hu–Morra–Schraen framework. It develops a GL toy case to expose structural obstructions: even under weak compatibility with , the image cannot equal when is reducible and , due to mismatches in Jordan–Hölder data and finiteness properties of . The work also establishes dimension bounds for in the toy case and proves that for irreducible there are infinitely many dimensions where no supersingular yields the desired equality, highlighting fundamental obstructions to reconstructing from via . Collectively, these results reveal pervasive limitations of Breuil–Herzig–Hu–Morra–Schraen-type conjectures when translated through Zábrádi’s functor, even in restricted or toy settings.

Abstract

Let be an -dimensional representation of over . When is generic and a good conjugate, the article "Conjectures and results on modular representations of for a -adic field ", by Breuil-Herzig-Hu-Morra-Schraen, introduces the notion of compatibility with for an admissible representation of . In loc. cit., the five authors also question whether one could recover a representation of , called and constructed from , from some compatible with by using Zábrádi's functor . We give a range of results, for an arbitrary verifying some "weak" compatibilities with , about how badly behaves. In particular, when is reducible and , no compatible with can verify .
Paper Structure (5 sections, 21 theorems, 51 equations)

This paper contains 5 sections, 21 theorems, 51 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 2.3

The following pair of functors are well defined. They are quasi-inverse to one another, giving an equivalence of symmetric monoidal closed categories.

Theorems & Definitions (56)

  • Definition 2.1
  • Definition 2.2: See marquis_formalisme
  • Theorem 2.3
  • Remark 2.4
  • Proposition 2.5
  • proof
  • Corollary 2.6
  • proof
  • Definition 2.7
  • Definition 2.8
  • ...and 46 more