Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Affine cohomology classes for filiform Lie algebras

Dietrich Burde

TL;DR

The paper analyzes when filiform nilpotent Lie algebras admit canonical affine structures by studying affine cohomology classes in $H^2(\mathfrak{g},K)$. It develops an adapted-basis framework to parameterize filiform algebras, connects affine cohomology to central extensions, and proves that the existence of an affine class yields a canonical affine structure, while minimal second Betti number $b_2(\mathfrak{g})=2$ often obstructs such classes. The authors compute $H^2(\mathfrak{g},K)$ for all $n\le 11$ and for select $n\ge 12$ cases, presenting explicit cocycles and a dichotomy between algebras that do and do not admit affine cohomology classes. They further classify higher-dimensional cases, showing universal affine structure for certain classes $\mathfrak{A}_n^1(K)$ and polynomial-dependent behavior for $\mathfrak{A}^2_n(K)$, with no affine structure for $\mathfrak{A}^2_{13}(K)$ and implications for the minimal faithful module dimension.

Abstract

We classify the cohomology spaces $H^2(\mathfrak{g},K)$ for all filiform nilpotent Lie algebras of dimension $n\le 11$ over $K$ and for certain classes of algebras of dimension $n\ge 12$. The result is applied to the determination of affine cohomology classes $[ω]\in H^2(\mathfrak{g},K)$. We prove the general result that the existence of an affine cohomology class implies an affine structure of canonical type on $\mathfrak{g}$, hence a canonical left-invariant affine structure on the corresponding nilpotent Lie group. For certain filiform algebras the absence of an affine cohomology class implies the nonexistence of any affine structure. Of particular interest are algebras $\mathfrak{g}$ with minimal Betti numbers $b_1(\mathfrak{g})=b_2(\mathfrak{g})=2$.

Affine cohomology classes for filiform Lie algebras

TL;DR

The paper analyzes when filiform nilpotent Lie algebras admit canonical affine structures by studying affine cohomology classes in . It develops an adapted-basis framework to parameterize filiform algebras, connects affine cohomology to central extensions, and proves that the existence of an affine class yields a canonical affine structure, while minimal second Betti number often obstructs such classes. The authors compute for all and for select cases, presenting explicit cocycles and a dichotomy between algebras that do and do not admit affine cohomology classes. They further classify higher-dimensional cases, showing universal affine structure for certain classes and polynomial-dependent behavior for , with no affine structure for and implications for the minimal faithful module dimension.

Abstract

We classify the cohomology spaces for all filiform nilpotent Lie algebras of dimension over and for certain classes of algebras of dimension . The result is applied to the determination of affine cohomology classes . We prove the general result that the existence of an affine cohomology class implies an affine structure of canonical type on , hence a canonical left-invariant affine structure on the corresponding nilpotent Lie group. For certain filiform algebras the absence of an affine cohomology class implies the nonexistence of any affine structure. Of particular interest are algebras with minimal Betti numbers .
Paper Structure (4 sections, 17 theorems, 31 equations)

This paper contains 4 sections, 17 theorems, 31 equations.

Key Result

Proposition 1.3

Let $G$ be a simply connected Lie group with Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$. There is a canonical one-to-one correspondence between left-invariant affine structures on $G$ and affine structures on $\mathfrak{g}$.

Theorems & Definitions (36)

  • Definition 1.1
  • Definition 1.2
  • Proposition 1.3
  • Definition 2.1
  • Remark 2.2
  • Example 2.3
  • Definition 2.4
  • Lemma 2.5
  • Definition 2.6
  • Lemma 2.7
  • ...and 26 more