Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Depth-Wise Representation Development Under Blockwise Self-Supervised Learning for Video Vision Transformers

Jonas Römer, Timo Dickscheid

TL;DR

This study investigates whether blockwise self-supervised learning (BWSSL) can train masked video transformers without end-to-end backprop, addressing spatiotemporal dependencies in video data. By partitioning a VideoMAE-style ViT into gradient-isolated blocks and applying local masked reconstruction losses, BWSSL achieves representations that nearly match end-to-end baselines on downstream tasks like linear probing and retrieval across model sizes and block granularities. Depth-resolved analyses reveal that BWSSL shifts high-level decodability to earlier blocks while later blocks exhibit saturation and more geometry-preserving updates, with token mixing and patch-token redistribution emerging in distinctive ways. The work positions BWSSL as a viable alternative to E2E under certain regime conditions, highlighting design choices around decoders, block granularity, and the balance between local supervision and global representation alignment.

Abstract

End-to-end backpropagation couples all layers through a global error signal, enabling coordinated learning but requiring long-range credit assignment. Motivated by recent progress in blockwise self-supervised learning (BWSSL), we ask whether masked video transformers can be trained without end-to-end backpropagation. Applying BWSSL to masked video modeling remains relatively underexplored and must handle spatiotemporal context and long-range temporal structure. More broadly, analyses that compare BWSSL and end-to-end training in terms of learning dynamics and depth-wise representation development remain sparse. We apply blockwise learning to a masked autoencoding video vision transformer by partitioning the encoder into blocks, each of which is optimized with a local masked reconstruction loss. Across model sizes and partition granularities, training converges and yields representations close to matched end-to-end baselines under linear-probe and retrieval proxies. In order to compare intermediate representations, we analyze depth-wise decodability, inter-block similarity, and patch-level diagnostics. Blockwise training exposes higher-level structure earlier, while later blocks saturate and operate in a more geometry-preserving regime. It can also induce token-level shifts consistent with stronger early mixing that pooled metrics can miss. These findings point to late-block saturation and interface formation as contributors to the remaining gap.

Depth-Wise Representation Development Under Blockwise Self-Supervised Learning for Video Vision Transformers

TL;DR

This study investigates whether blockwise self-supervised learning (BWSSL) can train masked video transformers without end-to-end backprop, addressing spatiotemporal dependencies in video data. By partitioning a VideoMAE-style ViT into gradient-isolated blocks and applying local masked reconstruction losses, BWSSL achieves representations that nearly match end-to-end baselines on downstream tasks like linear probing and retrieval across model sizes and block granularities. Depth-resolved analyses reveal that BWSSL shifts high-level decodability to earlier blocks while later blocks exhibit saturation and more geometry-preserving updates, with token mixing and patch-token redistribution emerging in distinctive ways. The work positions BWSSL as a viable alternative to E2E under certain regime conditions, highlighting design choices around decoders, block granularity, and the balance between local supervision and global representation alignment.

Abstract

End-to-end backpropagation couples all layers through a global error signal, enabling coordinated learning but requiring long-range credit assignment. Motivated by recent progress in blockwise self-supervised learning (BWSSL), we ask whether masked video transformers can be trained without end-to-end backpropagation. Applying BWSSL to masked video modeling remains relatively underexplored and must handle spatiotemporal context and long-range temporal structure. More broadly, analyses that compare BWSSL and end-to-end training in terms of learning dynamics and depth-wise representation development remain sparse. We apply blockwise learning to a masked autoencoding video vision transformer by partitioning the encoder into blocks, each of which is optimized with a local masked reconstruction loss. Across model sizes and partition granularities, training converges and yields representations close to matched end-to-end baselines under linear-probe and retrieval proxies. In order to compare intermediate representations, we analyze depth-wise decodability, inter-block similarity, and patch-level diagnostics. Blockwise training exposes higher-level structure earlier, while later blocks saturate and operate in a more geometry-preserving regime. It can also induce token-level shifts consistent with stronger early mixing that pooled metrics can miss. These findings point to late-block saturation and interface formation as contributors to the remaining gap.
Paper Structure (36 sections, 2 equations, 5 figures)

This paper contains 36 sections, 2 equations, 5 figures.

Figures (5)

  • Figure 1: Training and Evaluation of the BWSSL model for video data. We train a ViT for video data using a masked autoencoding objective. The architecture is split into four (this Figure) or six blocks each containing multiple transformer layers. BWSSL training is carried out in sequential & simultaneous fashion, with MSE reconstruction losses attached to block outputs. This is compared to a classical E2E training using the last block output. We analyze learned representations by comparing and probing embeddings generated by each block under BWSSL and E2E training.
  • Figure 2: Downstream task metrics. Results for BWSSL ($K{=}4,6$; sequential vs. simultaneous) and matched E2E baselines, for DeiT-Tiny and DeiT-Small on UCF101. (a) Linear-probe accuracy. (b) Retrieval mAP. (c) Masked reconstruction MSE.
  • Figure 3: Linear probing across increasing target complexity. We probe embeddings from each block using labels that range from (a) low-level stimulus parameters to (b) cross-field relations to (c) high-level action categories. Bottom: example frames from each dataset.
  • Figure 4: Reconstruction loss and inter-block similarity. (a) Masked reconstruction MSE after each block (E2E at the final block). (b) CKA between successive blocks. Lower values indicate larger representational updates. (c) Relationship between inter-block CKA and the corresponding change in retrieval mAP.
  • Figure 5: Patch-level robustness and token mixing across blocks. We quantify (a,b) robustness of linear decoding under extreme spatial occlusion (OccDrop in Sec. \ref{['sec:analysis:patch_level']}) and (c) patch-token homogenization via cosine patch similarity (CPS).