Table of Contents
Fetching ...

$L^p$-Convergence of Fourier-Heckman-Opdam Expansions

Bechir Amri

TL;DR

This paper addresses the L^p convergence of Fourier expansions built from non-symmetric Heckman-Opdam polynomials of type $A_1$. It develops a kernel-based approach and duality arguments to prove convergence of the partial sums $S_N(f)$ for functions in $L^p([-\,\pi,\pi],dm_k)$ within the sharp range $2-\frac{1}{k+1}<p<2+\frac{1}{k}$, and it furnishes a counterexample outside this interval. The results rely on explicit formulas and norms for $E_n^k$, the relation to $P_n^k$, and careful kernel estimates involving ultraspherical polynomials. This extends harmonic analysis on root-system-related Fourier expansions and clarifies convergence behavior for these generalized orthogonal bases.

Abstract

We study the $L^p$-convergence of Fourier expansions in terms of non-symmetric Heckman-Opdam polynomials of type $A_1$. Using kernel estimates and duality arguments, we prove that the partial sums converge in $ L^p([-π,π],dm_k)$ for $$2-\frac{1}{k+1} < p < 2+\frac{1}{k}.$$

$L^p$-Convergence of Fourier-Heckman-Opdam Expansions

TL;DR

This paper addresses the L^p convergence of Fourier expansions built from non-symmetric Heckman-Opdam polynomials of type . It develops a kernel-based approach and duality arguments to prove convergence of the partial sums for functions in within the sharp range , and it furnishes a counterexample outside this interval. The results rely on explicit formulas and norms for , the relation to , and careful kernel estimates involving ultraspherical polynomials. This extends harmonic analysis on root-system-related Fourier expansions and clarifies convergence behavior for these generalized orthogonal bases.

Abstract

We study the -convergence of Fourier expansions in terms of non-symmetric Heckman-Opdam polynomials of type . Using kernel estimates and duality arguments, we prove that the partial sums converge in for
Paper Structure (3 sections, 10 theorems, 93 equations)

This paper contains 3 sections, 10 theorems, 93 equations.

Key Result

Proposition 2.1

For all $n\in \mathbb{Z}$, we have

Theorems & Definitions (19)

  • Proposition 2.1
  • proof
  • Proposition 2.2
  • proof
  • Proposition 2.3
  • proof
  • Theorem 3.1: Main result
  • Lemma 3.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 3.3
  • ...and 9 more