M3-BENCH: Process-Aware Evaluation of LLM Agents Social Behaviors in Mixed-Motive Games
Sixiong Xie, Zhuofan Shi, Haiyang Shen, Gang Huang, Yun Ma, Xiang Jing
TL;DR
M3-Bench tackles the challenge of evaluating advanced social behaviors of LLM agents in mixed-motive games by shifting from outcome-only benchmarks to a process-aware framework that analyzes action, reasoning, and communication. It introduces a four-level task design and three analytical modules—Behavioral Trajectory Analysis, Reasoning Process Analysis, and Communication Content Analysis—whose outputs are integrated into portrait-style characterizations anchored by the Big Five and Social Exchange Theory. The framework enables cross-task portrait generation and audits for alignment between what agents do, think, and say, uncovering inconsistencies such as superficially cooperative behavior paired with opportunistic reasoning. Experimental results show that M3-Bench can reliably distinguish social capabilities across models and reveal risks associated with communication as a double-edged tool, underscoring the value of cross-auditing for safety governance and capability improvement in LLM agents.
Abstract
As the capabilities of large language model (LLM) agents continue to advance, their advanced social behaviors, such as cooperation, deception, and collusion, call for systematic evaluation. However, existing benchmarks often emphasize a single capability dimension or rely solely on behavioral outcomes, overlooking rich process information from agents' decision reasoning and communicative interactions. To address this gap, we propose M3-Bench, a multi-stage benchmark for mixed-motive games, together with a process-aware evaluation framework that conducts synergistic analysis across three modules: BTA (Behavioral Trajectory Analysis), RPA (Reasoning Process Analysis), and CCA (Communication Content Analysis). Furthermore, we integrate the Big Five personality model and Social Exchange Theory to aggregate multi-dimensional evidence into interpretable social behavior portraits, thereby characterizing agents' personality traits and capability profiles beyond simple task scores or outcome-based metrics. Experimental results show that M3-Bench can reliably distinguish diverse social behavior competencies across models, and it reveals that some models achieve seemingly reasonable behavioral outcomes while exhibiting pronounced inconsistencies in their reasoning and communication.
