Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A parsimonious tail compliant multiscale statistical model for aggregated rainfall

Pierre Ailliot, Carlo Gaetan, Philippe Naveau

TL;DR

This work introduces a parsimonious, tail-compliant framework for modeling rainfall intensities across multiple aggregation scales by leveraging the Extended Generalized Pareto Distribution (EGPD) and a compound Poisson representation. The key idea is that aggregation across time scales can be analyzed within the EGPD family, preserving tail behavior and avoiding return-level crossings, while enabling efficient inference via Panjer recursion. The model expresses aggregated rainfall at scale d as $A_d=(Y_1+\cdots+Y_d)^+$ and assumes $A_d\sim EGPD(\sigma_d,\kappa,\xi,\lambda_d)$ with parametric forms for $\sigma_d$ and $\lambda_d$ driven by $\log d$, while keeping $\kappa$ and $\xi$ fixed to maintain cross-scale coherence. Applied to six French stations with 6-minute data, the approach yields plausible tail parameters ($\xi$ and $\kappa$) and monotonically increasing scale parameters, producing good fits for scales from 30 minutes to 3 days and enabling cross-scale IDF-like curves with eight parameters per station. The method offers a practical, likelihood-based alternative to block-max IDF approaches, providing a unified framework for estimating rainfall distributions across durations and return periods, including short return periods.

Abstract

Modeling rainfall intensity distributions across aggregation scales (from sub-hourly to weekly) is essential for hydrological risk analysis and IDF curves. Aggregation naturally imposes mathematical constraints: return levels must be ordered by time scale, as daily accumulations necessarily exceed sub-daily ones. From a statistical perspective, each aggregation step should ideally not require additional parameters, yet parsimonious models describing the full distribution remain scarce, as most literature focuses on seasonal block maxima. In this study, we propose a parsimonious framework to model all rainfall intensities (low to large) across scales. We utilize the Extended Generalized Pareto Distribution (EGPD), which aligns with extreme value theory for both tails while remaining flexible for the bulk of the distribution. We establish a general result on the behavior of EGPD variables under various aggregation procedures. To overcome the difficulty of direct likelihood inference, we link the EGPD class to Poisson compound sums. This allows the use of the Panjer algorithm for efficient composite likelihood evaluation. Our approach ensures that return levels do not cross across scales and enables estimation for return periods below annual or seasonal levels. We demonstrate the method using sub-hourly series from six French stations with diverse climates. Only eight parameters are needed per station to capture scales from six minutes to three days. IDF curves above and below the annual scale are provided.

A parsimonious tail compliant multiscale statistical model for aggregated rainfall

TL;DR

This work introduces a parsimonious, tail-compliant framework for modeling rainfall intensities across multiple aggregation scales by leveraging the Extended Generalized Pareto Distribution (EGPD) and a compound Poisson representation. The key idea is that aggregation across time scales can be analyzed within the EGPD family, preserving tail behavior and avoiding return-level crossings, while enabling efficient inference via Panjer recursion. The model expresses aggregated rainfall at scale d as and assumes with parametric forms for and driven by , while keeping and fixed to maintain cross-scale coherence. Applied to six French stations with 6-minute data, the approach yields plausible tail parameters ( and ) and monotonically increasing scale parameters, producing good fits for scales from 30 minutes to 3 days and enabling cross-scale IDF-like curves with eight parameters per station. The method offers a practical, likelihood-based alternative to block-max IDF approaches, providing a unified framework for estimating rainfall distributions across durations and return periods, including short return periods.

Abstract

Modeling rainfall intensity distributions across aggregation scales (from sub-hourly to weekly) is essential for hydrological risk analysis and IDF curves. Aggregation naturally imposes mathematical constraints: return levels must be ordered by time scale, as daily accumulations necessarily exceed sub-daily ones. From a statistical perspective, each aggregation step should ideally not require additional parameters, yet parsimonious models describing the full distribution remain scarce, as most literature focuses on seasonal block maxima. In this study, we propose a parsimonious framework to model all rainfall intensities (low to large) across scales. We utilize the Extended Generalized Pareto Distribution (EGPD), which aligns with extreme value theory for both tails while remaining flexible for the bulk of the distribution. We establish a general result on the behavior of EGPD variables under various aggregation procedures. To overcome the difficulty of direct likelihood inference, we link the EGPD class to Poisson compound sums. This allows the use of the Panjer algorithm for efficient composite likelihood evaluation. Our approach ensures that return levels do not cross across scales and enables estimation for return periods below annual or seasonal levels. We demonstrate the method using sub-hourly series from six French stations with diverse climates. Only eight parameters are needed per station to capture scales from six minutes to three days. IDF curves above and below the annual scale are provided.
Paper Structure (21 sections, 4 theorems, 60 equations, 8 figures, 1 table)

This paper contains 21 sections, 4 theorems, 60 equations, 8 figures, 1 table.

Key Result

Proposition 2.2

Let $T$ be a non-negative random variable and $Y \sim EGPD(\sigma,\kappa, \xi, B)$ for $\xi>0$, $\kappa>0$. If there exist some positive and finite constants $\alpha$, $\beta$ and $\gamma$ such that then there exists a cdf $B_T$ such that $T \sim EGPD(\sigma,\gamma \kappa, \xi, B_T)$ with

Figures (8)

  • Figure 1: Histogram of positive rainfall (i.e. after removing dry) aggregated over different time scales in Brest. The stars on the x-axis correspond to the $20$ more extremes observations. The yearly histogram is plotted for illustration purpose, the modeling of such aggregation scale is not discussed in the paper. The results at the annual scale were obtained using $80$ years of daily data downloaded from https://www.ecad.eu/, whereas the other histograms are based on 18 years of 6-minute data for August-September described in Section \ref{['sec:data']}.
  • Figure 2: Left panels: pdf of the $EGPD(\sigma,\kappa,\xi,\lambda)$, see Definition \ref{['def:CEGPD+']}, with $\kappa=0.3$, $\sigma=1$, $\xi =0.25$ and various values of the mean $\lambda$ given in the legend. Middle panels: same as left panels with log scale on both axis. Right panels: corresponding pdfs $b_\lambda(\cdot)$. All the pdfs are numerically approximated using the Panjer recursions, see \ref{['sec:Panjer']}
  • Figure 3: Locations of the meteorological stations considered in this study. Météo-France recorded 6-minute rainfall time series for the period 2006-2023 (with a tipping bucket precision of $0.2$ mm).
  • Figure 4: Estimation of $\xi$ (left panel) and $\kappa$ (right panel) of model \ref{['eq:mod']} applied to the eight locations shown in Figure \ref{['fig:carte']}. The x-axis is ordered with respect to the estimated value of $\xi$. The boxplots are computed using block bootstrap. The blue stars on the right panel represent the empirical estimate of $P[Y\geq 0.4]=1-P[Y=0.2]$ where $Y$ denotes the 6-minutes rainfall data. Results for August-September based on 18 years of six-minutes data.
  • Figure 5: Estimation of $\sigma_d$ (left panel) and $\lambda_d$ (right panel) as a function of the duration of aggregation $d$ in Brest. The $95\%$ confidence bands were computed using block bootstrap. Results for August-September based on 18 years of 6-minute data.
  • ...and 3 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (7)

  • Definition 2.1
  • Proposition 2.2
  • Definition 2.3
  • Proposition 2.4
  • Definition 2.5
  • Proposition 3.1
  • Lemma C.1