Table of Contents
Fetching ...

$S$-Prime and $S$-maximal ideals in trivial ring extensions of commutative rings

Hwankoo Kim, Najib Mahdou, El Houssaine Oubouhou

TL;DR

The paper investigates $S$-prime and $S$-maximal ideals in the trivial ring extension $A \ltimes M$ and shows that these ideals need not be homogeneous, nor necessarily of the form $P \ltimes M$ with $P$ an $S_0$-prime of $A$. It provides a sharp criterion: an ideal $J$ of $R=A \ltimes M$ is $S$-prime (resp., $S$-maximal) if and only if $J_0$ is $S_0$-prime (resp., $S_0$-maximal) and $M/J_1$ is uniformly $S_0$-torsion, leading to the conclusion that all $S$-prime ideals are of the form $P \ltimes M$ precisely when $M$ is $S_0$-divisible. The work further proves that $S$-maximal ideals share the same $J_0$-$J_1$-structure and applies these ideas to transferability results for compactly $S$-packed, coprimely $S$-packed, and $S$-$pm$-properties from $A$ to $A \ltimes M$, clarifying when divisibility conditions are necessary. Overall, the results deepen understanding of how $S$-primality and $S$-maximality behave under trivial ring extensions and provide practical criteria for related algebraic properties.

Abstract

This paper explores the study of $S$-prime and $S$-maximal ideals in the context of trivial ring extensions $A \ltimes M$. Through counterexamples, we demonstrate that $S$-prime (resp., $S$-maximal) ideals in $A \ltimes M$ are not necessarily homogeneous, and a homogeneous $S$-prime (resp., $S$-maximal) ideal does not necessarily have the form $P \ltimes M$, where $P$ is an $S_0$-prime (resp., $S_0$-maximal) ideal of $A$. Moreover, we characterize the conditions under which an ideal $J$ (not necessarily homogeneous) in the trivial ring extension $A \ltimes M$ is $S$-prime (resp., $S$-maximal). Additionally, we demonstrate that all $S$-prime (and consequently $S$-maximal) ideals in $A \ltimes M$ are of the form $P \ltimes M$, where $P$ is an $S_0$-prime ideal of $A$, if and only if $M$ is an $S_0$-divisible $A$-module. As an application, we explore the transfer of the concepts of compactly $S$-packed rings, coprimely $S$-packed rings and $S$-$pm$-rings to the trivial ring extension. These results provide significant insights into the relation between $S$-primality and $S$-maximality in trivial ring extensions, contributing to a deeper understanding of ideal theory in this context. This work not only enriches the theoretical framework of ring structures but also advances the broader field of algebraic theory through practical examples and applications.

$S$-Prime and $S$-maximal ideals in trivial ring extensions of commutative rings

TL;DR

The paper investigates -prime and -maximal ideals in the trivial ring extension and shows that these ideals need not be homogeneous, nor necessarily of the form with an -prime of . It provides a sharp criterion: an ideal of is -prime (resp., -maximal) if and only if is -prime (resp., -maximal) and is uniformly -torsion, leading to the conclusion that all -prime ideals are of the form precisely when is -divisible. The work further proves that -maximal ideals share the same --structure and applies these ideas to transferability results for compactly -packed, coprimely -packed, and --properties from to , clarifying when divisibility conditions are necessary. Overall, the results deepen understanding of how -primality and -maximality behave under trivial ring extensions and provide practical criteria for related algebraic properties.

Abstract

This paper explores the study of -prime and -maximal ideals in the context of trivial ring extensions . Through counterexamples, we demonstrate that -prime (resp., -maximal) ideals in are not necessarily homogeneous, and a homogeneous -prime (resp., -maximal) ideal does not necessarily have the form , where is an -prime (resp., -maximal) ideal of . Moreover, we characterize the conditions under which an ideal (not necessarily homogeneous) in the trivial ring extension is -prime (resp., -maximal). Additionally, we demonstrate that all -prime (and consequently -maximal) ideals in are of the form , where is an -prime ideal of , if and only if is an -divisible -module. As an application, we explore the transfer of the concepts of compactly -packed rings, coprimely -packed rings and --rings to the trivial ring extension. These results provide significant insights into the relation between -primality and -maximality in trivial ring extensions, contributing to a deeper understanding of ideal theory in this context. This work not only enriches the theoretical framework of ring structures but also advances the broader field of algebraic theory through practical examples and applications.
Paper Structure (3 sections, 19 theorems, 56 equations)

This paper contains 3 sections, 19 theorems, 56 equations.

Key Result

Lemma 2.1

Let $M$ be a $\mathbb{Z}$-module, and let $R = \mathbb{Z} \ltimes M$ be the trivial ring extension. If $S$ is a multiplicative subset of $R$, then an ideal $P \nsubseteq Nil(R)$ of $R$ is $S$-prime if and only if it is $S$-maximal.

Theorems & Definitions (26)

  • Lemma 2.1
  • Example 2.2
  • Example 2.3
  • Example 2.4
  • Lemma 2.5
  • Lemma 2.6
  • Lemma 2.7
  • Theorem 2.8
  • Theorem 2.9
  • Corollary 2.10
  • ...and 16 more