Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Low-like basis theorems for Ramsey's theorem for pairs in first-order arithmetic

Hiroyuki Ikari, Keita Yokoyama

TL;DR

This work investigates the first-order strength of Ramsey-type theorems for pairs by constructing low-like ($ll^2$) solutions to their natural decompositions, including $\mathrm{COH}$, $\mathrm{D}^2_2$, $\mathrm{D}^2$, and $\mathrm{sEM}_{<\infty}$. The authors develop $ll^2$-basis theorems using Mathias forcing inside effectively coded $\omega$-models of $\mathsf{WKL_0}$, working within $\mathrm{I}\Sigma^0_{2}$ and $\mathrm{B}\Sigma^0_3$ to obtain low-like solutions and, in turn, $\Pi^1_1$-conservativity results for the Ramsey principles. Key contributions include $ll^2$-basis theorems for $\mathrm{COH}$, $\mathrm{EM}_{<\infty}$, and $\mathrm{D}^2$, as well as a new presentation showing that $\mathrm{RT}^2$ (and its variants) yield simpler conservation proofs and potential polynomial-time proof transformations. The work thus clarifies the first-order consequences of Ramsey-type theorems and provides a unified forcing-based approach to obtaining low-like bases under weak induction, with implications for proof theory and reverse mathematics.

Abstract

We construct an $\ll^2$-solution (also known as a weakly low solution) to ${\mathrm{D}^2}$ within ${\mathrm{B}Σ^0_{3}}$ and prove the $\ll^2$-basis theorem for $\mathrm{RT}^2$ over ${\mathrm{B}Σ^0_{3}}$. The $\ll^2$-basis theorem is a variant of the low basis theorem, which has recently received focus in the context of the first-order part of Ramsey type theorems. For the construction, we use Mathias forcing in an effectively coded $ω$-model of $\mathsf{WKL_0}$ to ensure sufficient computability under the system with weaker induction. Using a similar method, we also show the $\ll^2$-basis theorem for $\mathrm{RT}^2_2$ and $\mathrm{EM}_{<\infty}$, a version of Erdős-Moser principle, within $\mathrm{I}Σ^0_{2}$. These results provide simpler proofs of known results on the $Π^1_1$-conservativities of $\mathrm{RT}^2, \mathrm{RT}^2_2$ and $\mathrm{EM}_{<\infty}$ as corollaries.

Low-like basis theorems for Ramsey's theorem for pairs in first-order arithmetic

TL;DR

This work investigates the first-order strength of Ramsey-type theorems for pairs by constructing low-like () solutions to their natural decompositions, including , , , and . The authors develop -basis theorems using Mathias forcing inside effectively coded -models of , working within and to obtain low-like solutions and, in turn, -conservativity results for the Ramsey principles. Key contributions include -basis theorems for , , and , as well as a new presentation showing that (and its variants) yield simpler conservation proofs and potential polynomial-time proof transformations. The work thus clarifies the first-order consequences of Ramsey-type theorems and provides a unified forcing-based approach to obtaining low-like bases under weak induction, with implications for proof theory and reverse mathematics.

Abstract

We construct an -solution (also known as a weakly low solution) to within and prove the -basis theorem for over . The -basis theorem is a variant of the low basis theorem, which has recently received focus in the context of the first-order part of Ramsey type theorems. For the construction, we use Mathias forcing in an effectively coded -model of to ensure sufficient computability under the system with weaker induction. Using a similar method, we also show the -basis theorem for and , a version of Erdős-Moser principle, within . These results provide simpler proofs of known results on the -conservativities of and as corollaries.
Paper Structure (10 sections, 17 theorems, 16 equations)

This paper contains 10 sections, 17 theorems, 16 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 2.6

Let $n,m\ge 1$. Then $\mathsf{RCA_0}$ proves the following.

Theorems & Definitions (50)

  • Definition 2.1
  • Remark 2.2
  • Definition 2.3
  • Definition 2.4: Turing jump
  • Definition 2.5: Low sets
  • Theorem 2.6
  • Theorem 2.7: Low basis theorem HaPu
  • Theorem 2.8: Primitive recursion sosoa
  • Remark 2.9
  • Theorem 2.10
  • ...and 40 more