Functional Synthetic Control Methods for Metric Space-Valued Outcomes
Ryo Okano, Daisuke Kurisu
TL;DR
This paper extends causal inference with synthetic controls to outcomes that lie in general metric spaces by embedding them isometrically into Hilbert spaces. The authors introduce the Functional Synthetic Control (FSC) method and a bias-corrected, ridge-augmented FSC, derive finite-sample error bounds under autoregressive and latent-factor models, and develop conformal inference and placebo tests for counterfactuals. They demonstrate improved pre-treatment fit and reliable inference through simulations and three empirical analyses: abortion legislation's impact on fertility curves in East Germany, the Soviet collapse’s effect on Russia’s mortality distributions, and the Brexit announcement’s effect on UK service-trade covariance. The framework accommodates diverse data types (functions, distributions, covariance matrices, networks, compositional data) and provides practical tools for causal analysis in complex-valued outcomes with scalable theory. The work opens avenues for extensions to SDID and staggered adoption designs and includes publicly available code.
Abstract
The synthetic control method (SCM) is a widely used tool for evaluating causal effects of policy changes in panel data settings. Recent studies have extended its framework to accommodate complex outcomes that take values in metric spaces, such as distributions, functions, networks, covariance matrices, and compositional data. However, due to the lack of linear structure in general metric spaces, theoretical guarantees for estimation and inference within these extended frameworks remain underdeveloped. In this study, we propose the functional synthetic control (FSC) method as an extension of the SCM for metric space-valued outcomes. To address challenges arising from the nonlinearlity of metric spaces, we leverage isometric embeddings into Hilbert spaces. Building on this approach, we develop the FSC and augmented FSC estimators for counterfactual outcomes, with the latter being a bias-corrected version of the former. We then derive their finite-sample error bounds to establish theoretical guarantees for estimation, and construct prediction sets based on these estimators to conduct inference on causal effects. We demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed framework through simulation studies and three empirical applications.
