Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Homotopy categories of admissible model structures on extriangulated categories

Shun-Jie Li, Yang Gao, Pu Zhang

TL;DR

This work provides an alternative triangulated-structure proof for the homotopy category of an admissible model structure on a weakly idempotent complete extriangulated category. By constructing standard triangles from suspension sequences and $\mathbb{E}$-triangles, it defines a class $\Delta$ of distinguished triangles and proves that $(\mathrm{Ho}(\mathcal{A}),\Sigma,\Delta)$ is triangulated, offering a direct link to Heller–Happel’s framework. It also clarifies the relationship with NP’s original distinguished triangles by showing $\Delta = -\widetilde{\Delta}$, yielding a triangle-isomorphism between the two triangulations. The results unify model-categorical, cotorsion-pair, and extriangulated techniques, and extend to stable categories of Frobenius extriangulated categories, highlighting broad applicability in homological algebra and representation theory. Overall, the paper provides a streamlined, self-contained alternative route to NP’s theorem and deepens the connections between extriangulated structures and triangulated homotopy theories.

Abstract

The extriangulated category is a simultaneous generalization of exact categories and triangulated categories. H. Nakaoka and Y. Palu have proved that the homotopy category of an admissible model structure on a weakly idempotent complete extriangulated category is a triangulated category. Using the classic construction of distinguished triangles given by A. Heller and D. Happel, this paper provides an alternative proof of Nakaoka - Palu Theorem. In fact, the class $Δ$ of distinguished triangles in the present paper and the class $\widetildeΔ$ of distinguished triangles in \cite{NP} have the relation $Δ= - \widetildeΔ$, and hence the two triangulated structures on the homotopy category are isomorphic.

Homotopy categories of admissible model structures on extriangulated categories

TL;DR

This work provides an alternative triangulated-structure proof for the homotopy category of an admissible model structure on a weakly idempotent complete extriangulated category. By constructing standard triangles from suspension sequences and -triangles, it defines a class of distinguished triangles and proves that is triangulated, offering a direct link to Heller–Happel’s framework. It also clarifies the relationship with NP’s original distinguished triangles by showing , yielding a triangle-isomorphism between the two triangulations. The results unify model-categorical, cotorsion-pair, and extriangulated techniques, and extend to stable categories of Frobenius extriangulated categories, highlighting broad applicability in homological algebra and representation theory. Overall, the paper provides a streamlined, self-contained alternative route to NP’s theorem and deepens the connections between extriangulated structures and triangulated homotopy theories.

Abstract

The extriangulated category is a simultaneous generalization of exact categories and triangulated categories. H. Nakaoka and Y. Palu have proved that the homotopy category of an admissible model structure on a weakly idempotent complete extriangulated category is a triangulated category. Using the classic construction of distinguished triangles given by A. Heller and D. Happel, this paper provides an alternative proof of Nakaoka - Palu Theorem. In fact, the class of distinguished triangles in the present paper and the class of distinguished triangles in \cite{NP} have the relation , and hence the two triangulated structures on the homotopy category are isomorphic.
Paper Structure (15 sections, 31 theorems, 40 equations)

This paper contains 15 sections, 31 theorems, 40 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 2.3

Let $(\mathcal{A},\mathbb{E}, \mathfrak{s})$ be an extriangulated category. For any $\mathbb{E}$-triangle $X\overset{f}{\longrightarrow}Y\overset{g}{\longrightarrow}Z\overset{\delta}{\dashrightarrow}$ and object $W\in \mathcal{A}$, there are exact sequences of abelian groups$:$ and where $(\delta_{\#})_W \varphi:=\varphi^*\delta$ and $(\delta^{\#})_W \psi:=\psi_*\delta$.

Theorems & Definitions (53)

  • Definition 2.1: NP
  • Definition 2.2: NP
  • Theorem 2.3: NP
  • Corollary 2.4
  • Corollary 2.5: NP
  • Proposition 2.6: NP
  • Proposition 2.7
  • Proposition 2.8: NP
  • Definition 2.9: HJ
  • Proposition 2.10: HJ or LN
  • ...and 43 more