The ICASSP 2026 Automatic Song Aesthetics Evaluation Challenge
Guobin Ma, Yuxuan Xia, Jixun Yao, Huixin Xue, Hexin Liu, Shuai Wang, Hao Liu, Lei Xie
TL;DR
Addresses the problem of evaluating subjective song aesthetics for AI-generated music without reference signals. Proposes a two-track benchmark with a hierarchical scoring framework that yields a per-utterance, per-system composite $S_{set} = \frac{1}{4} \left( \mathrm{TTA}_{u} + \sum_{m \in \mathcal{M}} \frac{m_{u} + m_{s}}{2} \right)$ and track-specific aggregations for ranking: $ \text{Score}_{Track1} = 0.2 \times S_{\text{set1}} + 0.8 \times S_{\text{set2}}$ and $ \text{Score}_{Track2} = \frac{1}{5} \sum_{d=1}^{5} S_d$. The results show that top systems surpass the baseline by leveraging multi-representation fusion and structure-aware modeling, with strong generalization on both Regular and Hard splits but modest Top-Tier Accuracy. The work provides a standardized benchmark and evaluation methodology that can guide optimization and RL-based approaches in modern music generation.
Abstract
This paper summarizes the ICASSP 2026 Automatic Song Aesthetics Evaluation (ASAE) Challenge, which focuses on predicting the subjective aesthetic scores of AI-generated songs. The challenge consists of two tracks: Track 1 targets the prediction of the overall musicality score, while Track 2 focuses on predicting five fine-grained aesthetic scores. The challenge attracted strong interest from the research community and received numerous submissions from both academia and industry. Top-performing systems significantly surpassed the official baseline, demonstrating substantial progress in aligning objective metrics with human aesthetic preferences. The outcomes establish a standardized benchmark and advance human-aligned evaluation methodologies for modern music generation systems.
