Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A New Consistency Test for the $Λ$CDM Model using Radial and Transverse BAO Measurements

Xing-Han A. Zhao, Zheng Cai

TL;DR

The paper introduces a calibration-free consistency test for spatially flat $\Lambda$CDM based on ratios of BAO distances that cancel the sound horizon scale $r_{\rm d}$. By mapping each observed ratio to an effective ${\Omega}_{\rm M}^{\Lambda}$, the authors assess whether this parameter remains constant across redshift and ratio types, providing a null test of flat $\Lambda$CDM. Applying the method to DESI DR1 and DR2, they find ${\Omega}_{\rm M}^{\Lambda}$ values broadly consistent with a redshift-independent constant, with mild, non-significant deviations in some mixed-ratio tests. The approach leverages a redshift-matching scheme for integrated distances and propagates full covariance, offering a transparent, scalable consistency check that can be strengthened with future BAO data and generalized to broader cosmological models.

Abstract

We present a calibration-free consistency test of spatially flat $Λ$CDM based on baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) distance measurements. The method forms ratios of BAO distances -- the Hubble distance $Ð(z)$, the comoving angular diameter distance $\DM(z)$, and the volume-averaged distance $\DV(z)$ -- so that the sound horizon scale cancels, and then maps each observed ratio to an effective flat-$Λ$CDM matter density parameter, $\OmL$, defined as the value of $Ω_{\rm M}$ that reproduces the measured ratio within $Λ$CDM. Flat $Λ$CDM predicts that $\OmL$ should be independent of redshift and of the particular ratio used. For ratios involving the integrated distances $\DM$ and $\DV$, we associate them with well-defined effective line-of-sight redshift intervals using a redshift-matching strategy based on the integral mean value theorem. We apply the test to BAO measurements from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) Data Release~1 and Data Release~2, propagating the full published BAO covariance matrices into all derived ratios and $\OmL$ constraints. Within current uncertainties, the inferred $\OmL$ values are broadly consistent with a redshift-independent constant, providing an internal consistency check of flat $Λ$CDM that can be strengthened straightforwardly as BAO measurements improve.

A New Consistency Test for the $Λ$CDM Model using Radial and Transverse BAO Measurements

TL;DR

The paper introduces a calibration-free consistency test for spatially flat CDM based on ratios of BAO distances that cancel the sound horizon scale . By mapping each observed ratio to an effective , the authors assess whether this parameter remains constant across redshift and ratio types, providing a null test of flat CDM. Applying the method to DESI DR1 and DR2, they find values broadly consistent with a redshift-independent constant, with mild, non-significant deviations in some mixed-ratio tests. The approach leverages a redshift-matching scheme for integrated distances and propagates full covariance, offering a transparent, scalable consistency check that can be strengthened with future BAO data and generalized to broader cosmological models.

Abstract

We present a calibration-free consistency test of spatially flat CDM based on baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) distance measurements. The method forms ratios of BAO distances -- the Hubble distance , the comoving angular diameter distance , and the volume-averaged distance -- so that the sound horizon scale cancels, and then maps each observed ratio to an effective flat-CDM matter density parameter, , defined as the value of that reproduces the measured ratio within CDM. Flat CDM predicts that should be independent of redshift and of the particular ratio used. For ratios involving the integrated distances and , we associate them with well-defined effective line-of-sight redshift intervals using a redshift-matching strategy based on the integral mean value theorem. We apply the test to BAO measurements from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) Data Release~1 and Data Release~2, propagating the full published BAO covariance matrices into all derived ratios and constraints. Within current uncertainties, the inferred values are broadly consistent with a redshift-independent constant, providing an internal consistency check of flat CDM that can be strengthened straightforwardly as BAO measurements improve.
Paper Structure (22 sections, 18 equations, 2 figures, 2 tables)

This paper contains 22 sections, 18 equations, 2 figures, 2 tables.

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: Summary of BAO distances and ratio-based ${\Omega}_{\rm M}^{\Lambda}$ null tests. Panel $(A_1)$: $D_{\rm H}/r_{\rm d}$ as a function of redshift for DESI DR1, including direct radial BAO measurements (red points), and the effective $D_{\rm H}/r_{\rm d}$ ranges converted from $D_{\rm M}/r_{\rm d}$ (blue bands) and $D_{\rm V}/r_{\rm d}$ (green bands) using the redshift-matching procedure described in Secs. \ref{['subsec:zmatch']}--\ref{['subsec:DMtoDH']}. Panel $(A_2)$: ${\Omega}_{\rm M}^{\Lambda}$ inferred from the radial--radial ratio $D_{\rm H}(z_i)/D_{\rm H}(z_j)$ (red bands). Panel $(A_3)$: ${\Omega}_{\rm M}^{\Lambda}$ inferred from the radial--transverse ratio $D_{\rm H}(z_i)/D_{\rm M}(z_i)$ (blue bands). Panel $(A_4)$: ${\Omega}_{\rm M}^{\Lambda}$ inferred from the radial--isotropic ratio $D_{\rm H}(z_i)/D_{\rm V}(z_j)$ (green bands). Panels $(B_1)$--$(B_4)$ show the corresponding results for DESI DR2. The gray band in panels (A2)--(B4) shows the Planck 2018 flat-$\Lambda$CDM constraint on $\Omega_{\rm M}$ (shown for comparison; 68% CL) Planck2018.
  • Figure 2: Effective-redshift mapping implied by $D_{\rm M}(z)=z\,D_{\rm H}(z_{\rm c})$ (left) and $D_{\rm V}(z)=z\,D_{\rm H}(z_{\rm d})$ (right) in flat $\Lambda$CDM for representative values of ${\Omega}_{\rm M}$. For each $z$, the mapped redshifts satisfy $0<z_{\rm c}<z_{\rm d}<z$. Increasing ${\Omega}_{\rm M}$ shifts both $z_{\rm c}$ and $z_{\rm d}$ to lower values, so ${\Omega}_{\rm M}=1$ provides a conservative lower bound for the effective redshift associated with a given $D_{\rm M}(z)$ or $D_{\rm V}(z)$.