Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Imry-Ma phenomenon for the hard-core model on $\mathbb{Z}^{2}$

Irene Ayuso Ventura, Leandro Chiarini, Tyler Helmuth, Ellen Powell

TL;DR

This work demonstrates an Imry-Ma-type phenomenon for the two-dimensional hard-core model: arbitrarily weak disorder from site percolation destroys crystal-like order and yields a unique infinite-volume Gibbs measure for $G_p$ with $p<1$, extending to random site-dependent activities $\boldsymbol{\lambda}=\{\lambda X_v\}$. The authors adapt the Aizenman–Wehr framework to a constrained lattice gas by exploiting spatial symmetries rather than internal spin symmetries, and establish Gaussian domination of the random-field contribution while tightly bounding boundary effects. The result aligns with the intuition from random-field Ising models and shows disorder can preclude phase transitions in 2D particle systems, with potential extensions to higher dimensions and other disorder types. The methods provide a blueprint for analyzing crystallization under weak, spatially structured randomness and may inform algorithmic and theoretical questions in disordered bipartite graphs.

Abstract

The \emph{Imry-Ma phenomenon} refers to the dramatic effect that disorder can have on first-order phase transitions for two-dimensional spin systems. The most famous example is the absence of a phase transition for the two-dimensional random-field Ising model. This paper establishes that a similar phenomena takes place for the hard-core model, a discrete model of crystallization: arbitrarily weak disorder prevents the formation of a crystal. Our proof of this behaviour is an adaptation of the Aizenman-Wehr argument for the Imry-Ma phenomenon, with the use of internal (spin space) symmetries for spin systems being replaced by the use spatial symmetries.

Imry-Ma phenomenon for the hard-core model on $\mathbb{Z}^{2}$

TL;DR

This work demonstrates an Imry-Ma-type phenomenon for the two-dimensional hard-core model: arbitrarily weak disorder from site percolation destroys crystal-like order and yields a unique infinite-volume Gibbs measure for with , extending to random site-dependent activities . The authors adapt the Aizenman–Wehr framework to a constrained lattice gas by exploiting spatial symmetries rather than internal spin symmetries, and establish Gaussian domination of the random-field contribution while tightly bounding boundary effects. The result aligns with the intuition from random-field Ising models and shows disorder can preclude phase transitions in 2D particle systems, with potential extensions to higher dimensions and other disorder types. The methods provide a blueprint for analyzing crystallization under weak, spatially structured randomness and may inform algorithmic and theoretical questions in disordered bipartite graphs.

Abstract

The \emph{Imry-Ma phenomenon} refers to the dramatic effect that disorder can have on first-order phase transitions for two-dimensional spin systems. The most famous example is the absence of a phase transition for the two-dimensional random-field Ising model. This paper establishes that a similar phenomena takes place for the hard-core model, a discrete model of crystallization: arbitrarily weak disorder prevents the formation of a crystal. Our proof of this behaviour is an adaptation of the Aizenman-Wehr argument for the Imry-Ma phenomenon, with the use of internal (spin space) symmetries for spin systems being replaced by the use spatial symmetries.
Paper Structure (11 sections, 6 theorems, 81 equations, 3 figures)

This paper contains 11 sections, 6 theorems, 81 equations, 3 figures.

Key Result

theorem 1.1

Fix $\lambda\geq 0$, $p\in [0,1)$, and let $G_{p}$ be the random subgraph of $\mathbb{Z}^{2}$ determined by Bernoulli site percolation on $\mathbb{Z}^{2}$. Then $\mathcal{G}_{\lambda}(G_{p})$ is almost surely a singleton set.

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: The set of occupied vertices (filled circles) on the left is not independent: the two vertices contained in the red edge are adjacent. The set on the right is independent.
  • Figure 2: Illustration of ${\mathbf{x}}_{\Lambda_{2}^{c}}$ as defined in \ref{['eq:switch-off']}. The outer bold square delimits $\Lambda_5$, the inner one delimits $\Lambda_2$. Sites $v \in \Lambda_5 \setminus \Lambda_2$ (in grey) have activity $\lambda_v = \lambda \, x_v$, while $\lambda_v = \lambda$ for $v \in \Lambda_2$.
  • Figure 3: Two independent sets on $\Lambda_4$ with boundary conditions specified on $\Lambda_5$. On the left, the configuration has even boundary conditions (orange). On the right, the reflected configuration has odd boundary conditions (blue).

Theorems & Definitions (11)

  • theorem 1.1
  • theorem 1.2
  • theorem 2.1
  • lemma 3.1
  • remark 3.2: Important!
  • lemma 3.3
  • lemma 3.4
  • proof : Proof of \ref{['thm:main-full']} given \ref{['lem:dG', 'lem:bound-conditional', 'lem:gaussian-domination']}.
  • proof : Proof of Lemma \ref{['lem:dG']}
  • proof : Proof of \ref{['lem:bound-conditional']}
  • ...and 1 more