Statistical Foundations of DIME: Risk Estimation for Practical Index Selection
Giulio D'Erasmo, Cesare Campagnano, Antonio Mallia, Pierpaolo Brutti, Nicola Tonellotto, Fabrizio Silvestri
TL;DR
The paper tackles the inefficiency of high-dimensional dense embeddings in information retrieval by proposing RDIME, a statistically grounded, per-query dimensionality selection criterion that eliminates the need for grid-search over global dimensionalities. Building on DIME and a modulation-estimator framework, it introduces Kernel DIME to weight contributions from top documents and derives a hard-thresholding rule that identifies which embedding dimensions carry latent query signal. Empirically, RDIME achieves parity with full-dimension baselines and fixed-k pruning while substantially reducing embedding size on average, across multiple models and datasets, without validation-set tuning. The work highlights a path toward adaptive, query-dependent dimension reduction in dense retrieval and discusses future directions for kernel choices and theoretical guarantees.
Abstract
High-dimensional dense embeddings have become central to modern Information Retrieval, but many dimensions are noisy or redundant. Recently proposed DIME (Dimension IMportance Estimation), provides query-dependent scores to identify informative components of embeddings. DIME relies on a costly grid search to select a priori a dimensionality for all the query corpus's embeddings. Our work provides a statistically grounded criterion that directly identifies the optimal set of dimensions for each query at inference time. Experiments confirm achieving parity of effectiveness and reduces embedding size by an average of $\sim50\%$ across different models and datasets at inference time.
