Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Is E. coli good at chemotaxis?

Robert G. Endres

Abstract

Bacteria seem masters of chemotaxis, yet recent work suggests otherwise. Hudson Mattingly and colleagues (Nature Physics, 2026) argue that Escherichia coli uses only a small fraction of the sensory information available at its surface, challenging the long-held view that bacterial chemotaxis operates near physical sensing limits. This article offers a brief conceptual discussion of their findings, placing them in the context of classical chemotaxis models, robustness to noise, and broader perspectives drawn from physics, biology, and Greek mythology.

Is E. coli good at chemotaxis?

Abstract

Bacteria seem masters of chemotaxis, yet recent work suggests otherwise. Hudson Mattingly and colleagues (Nature Physics, 2026) argue that Escherichia coli uses only a small fraction of the sensory information available at its surface, challenging the long-held view that bacterial chemotaxis operates near physical sensing limits. This article offers a brief conceptual discussion of their findings, placing them in the context of classical chemotaxis models, robustness to noise, and broader perspectives drawn from physics, biology, and Greek mythology.
Paper Structure (1 figure)

This paper contains 1 figure.

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: Sisyphus at the microscale. Like the mythical king, a bacterium struggles uphill—pushing against molecular noise and random reorientations. Unlike Sisyphus, however, it manages to steadily inch its way up the gradient. Hand drawing by Robert Endres.