Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Application of Hybrid Chain Storage Framework in Energy Trading and Carbon Asset Management

Yinghan Hou, Zongyou Yang, Xiaokun Yang

TL;DR

This work tackles the cost-audit tension in high-frequency energy trading and carbon asset management by introducing a hybrid on-chain/off-chain settlement framework. It anchors essential commitments on-chain while keeping settlement details off-chain, linked via deterministic digests such as $\text{digest} = \text{keccak256}(offChainData)$ and verified through replayable auditing. Key innovations include a constant-time RSA accumulator for membership verification, a carbon asset lifecycle invariant enforced on-chain, and a two-layer identity-gated selective disclosure mechanism to protect privacy. Empirical results show a ~39% reduction in on-chain gas costs, robust tamper detection (100% in Exp1), and reliable lifecycle conservation, demonstrating practical feasibility for audit-intensive and high-frequency infrastructures. The framework offers a scalable path to trustworthy, cost-efficient settlement in decentralized energy and carbon markets, without requiring full on-chain disclosure of sensitive data.

Abstract

Distributed energy trading and carbon asset management involve high-frequency, small-value settlements with strong audit requirements. Fully on-chain designs incur excessive cost, while purely off-chain approaches lack verifiable consistency. This paper presents a hybrid on-chain and off-chain settlement framework that anchors settlement commitments and key constraints on-chain and links off-chain records through deterministic digests and replayable auditing. Experiments under publicly constrained workloads show that the framework significantly reduces on-chain execution and storage cost while preserving audit trustworthiness.

Application of Hybrid Chain Storage Framework in Energy Trading and Carbon Asset Management

TL;DR

This work tackles the cost-audit tension in high-frequency energy trading and carbon asset management by introducing a hybrid on-chain/off-chain settlement framework. It anchors essential commitments on-chain while keeping settlement details off-chain, linked via deterministic digests such as and verified through replayable auditing. Key innovations include a constant-time RSA accumulator for membership verification, a carbon asset lifecycle invariant enforced on-chain, and a two-layer identity-gated selective disclosure mechanism to protect privacy. Empirical results show a ~39% reduction in on-chain gas costs, robust tamper detection (100% in Exp1), and reliable lifecycle conservation, demonstrating practical feasibility for audit-intensive and high-frequency infrastructures. The framework offers a scalable path to trustworthy, cost-efficient settlement in decentralized energy and carbon markets, without requiring full on-chain disclosure of sensitive data.

Abstract

Distributed energy trading and carbon asset management involve high-frequency, small-value settlements with strong audit requirements. Fully on-chain designs incur excessive cost, while purely off-chain approaches lack verifiable consistency. This paper presents a hybrid on-chain and off-chain settlement framework that anchors settlement commitments and key constraints on-chain and links off-chain records through deterministic digests and replayable auditing. Experiments under publicly constrained workloads show that the framework significantly reduces on-chain execution and storage cost while preserving audit trustworthiness.
Paper Structure (33 sections, 7 equations, 5 figures, 2 tables)

This paper contains 33 sections, 7 equations, 5 figures, 2 tables.

Figures (5)

  • Figure 1: Overall system architecture and trust boundary. The off-chain layer constructs deterministic digests from full records, while the on-chain layer anchors commitments and enforces constraints.
  • Figure 2: Core on-chain mechanisms. (a) Constant-time RSA accumulator verification with off-chain witness maintenance. (b) Carbon asset lifecycle conservation enforced by balance invariants. (c) Selective disclosure based on Merkle root commitments with identity-gated access control.
  • Figure 3: Amortized gas per transaction versus batch size
  • Figure 4: Hourly total gas consumption over twenty-four hours
  • Figure 5: Gas per transaction over twenty-four hours under capacity constraints