Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A Non-Reciprocal Elliptic Spectral Solution of the Right-Angle Penetrable Wedge Transmission Problem for $ν=\sqrt{2}$

Jonas Matuzas

TL;DR

We address a 2D Helmholtz transmission problem for an impedance-matched right-angle penetrable wedge with $ν=\sqrt{2}$ and $ρ=1$. By reformulating as a Sommerfeld spectral problem and exploiting a lemniscatic genus-one Snell surface, we uniformize the spectral data with a square-lattice Weierstrass uniformization and reconstruct the scattered transform $Q_{\mathrm{scat}}$ as a finite Weierstrass–$\zeta$ sum over a prescribed pole set plus a holomorphic remainder. A jet-killing construction enforces regularity at the physical base point, yielding a canonical no-double-counting representation and explicit residue data; the far-field coefficient follows from a steepest-descent evaluation. Numerical tests indicate the resulting diffraction coefficient is generally non-reciprocal, so the closed-form is not claimed to equal the reciprocal physical solution. The results are specialized to the integrable lemniscatic case $(\theta_w,ν,ρ)=(\pi/4,\sqrt{2},1)$, with extension to general wedges remaining an open challenge.

Abstract

We consider the two-dimensional time-harmonic transmission problem for an impedance-matched (ρ= 1) right-angle penetrable wedge at refractive index ratio ν= \sqrt{2}, in the integrable lemniscatic configuration (θ_w ,ν,ρ) = (π/4,\sqrt{2},1). Starting from Sommerfeld spectral representations, the transmission conditions on the two wedge faces yield a closed spectral functional system for the Sommerfeld transforms Q(ζ) and S(ζ). In this special configuration the associated Snell surface is the lemniscatic curve Y^2 = 2(t^4 + 1), uniformized by square-lattice Weierstrass functions with invariants (g_2,g_3) = (4,0). We construct an explicit meromorphic expression for a scattered transform Q_{scat} as a finite Weierstrass--ζsum plus an explicitly constructed pole-free elliptic remainder, with all pole coefficients computed algebraically from the forcing pole set. A birational (injective) uniformization is used to avoid label collisions on the torus and to make the scattered-allocation pole exclusion well posed. The resulting closed form solves the derived spectral functional system and satisfies the local regularity constraints imposed at the physical basepoint. However, numerical reciprocity tests on the far-field coefficient extracted from Q_{scat} indicate that the construction is generally non-reciprocal; accordingly we do not claim that the resulting diffraction coefficient coincides with the reciprocal physical transmission scattering solution. The result remains restricted to this integrable lemniscatic case; the general penetrable wedge remains challenging (see [10--12] and, in a related high-frequency penetrable-corner setting, [13]).

A Non-Reciprocal Elliptic Spectral Solution of the Right-Angle Penetrable Wedge Transmission Problem for $ν=\sqrt{2}$

TL;DR

We address a 2D Helmholtz transmission problem for an impedance-matched right-angle penetrable wedge with and . By reformulating as a Sommerfeld spectral problem and exploiting a lemniscatic genus-one Snell surface, we uniformize the spectral data with a square-lattice Weierstrass uniformization and reconstruct the scattered transform as a finite Weierstrass– sum over a prescribed pole set plus a holomorphic remainder. A jet-killing construction enforces regularity at the physical base point, yielding a canonical no-double-counting representation and explicit residue data; the far-field coefficient follows from a steepest-descent evaluation. Numerical tests indicate the resulting diffraction coefficient is generally non-reciprocal, so the closed-form is not claimed to equal the reciprocal physical solution. The results are specialized to the integrable lemniscatic case , with extension to general wedges remaining an open challenge.

Abstract

We consider the two-dimensional time-harmonic transmission problem for an impedance-matched (ρ= 1) right-angle penetrable wedge at refractive index ratio ν= \sqrt{2}, in the integrable lemniscatic configuration (θ_w ,ν,ρ) = (π/4,\sqrt{2},1). Starting from Sommerfeld spectral representations, the transmission conditions on the two wedge faces yield a closed spectral functional system for the Sommerfeld transforms Q(ζ) and S(ζ). In this special configuration the associated Snell surface is the lemniscatic curve Y^2 = 2(t^4 + 1), uniformized by square-lattice Weierstrass functions with invariants (g_2,g_3) = (4,0). We construct an explicit meromorphic expression for a scattered transform Q_{scat} as a finite Weierstrass--ζsum plus an explicitly constructed pole-free elliptic remainder, with all pole coefficients computed algebraically from the forcing pole set. A birational (injective) uniformization is used to avoid label collisions on the torus and to make the scattered-allocation pole exclusion well posed. The resulting closed form solves the derived spectral functional system and satisfies the local regularity constraints imposed at the physical basepoint. However, numerical reciprocity tests on the far-field coefficient extracted from Q_{scat} indicate that the construction is generally non-reciprocal; accordingly we do not claim that the resulting diffraction coefficient coincides with the reciprocal physical transmission scattering solution. The result remains restricted to this integrable lemniscatic case; the general penetrable wedge remains challenging (see [10--12] and, in a related high-frequency penetrable-corner setting, [13]).
Paper Structure (48 sections, 19 theorems, 112 equations)

This paper contains 48 sections, 19 theorems, 112 equations.

Key Result

Lemma 1.3

Let $\gamma$ be the Sommerfeld contour and strip described in §sec:sommerfeld. Suppose $H(\zeta)$ is analytic in that strip, satisfies the stated growth/decay bounds along $\gamma$, and define If $U(r,\theta)=0$ for all $r>0$ and for $\theta$ in an interval of length $2\theta_w$, then $H(\zeta)\equiv0$ in the strip.

Theorems & Definitions (35)

  • Remark 1.1: Normalization / gauge
  • Definition 1.2: Scattered allocation
  • Lemma 1.3: Sommerfeld nullity / uniqueness
  • proof
  • Proposition 1.4: Face coupling for $\rho=1$
  • proof
  • Theorem 1.5: Main results for the lemniscatic right-angle wedge
  • Remark 1.6: Reciprocity status
  • Lemma 4.1: Explicit algebraic pole points on $\Sigma_{\mathrm{lem}}$
  • proof
  • ...and 25 more