Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Galois theory, automorphism groups of prime models, and the Picard-Vessiot closure

David Meretzky, Anand Pillay

TL;DR

We address the synthesis of Galois theory within a model-theoretic setting: a full Galois correspondence is established for prime models over $A$ and minimal normal intermediate $B$, tying definable closures to closed subgroups of $Aut(B/A)$ and extending Poizat's $A_{min}$ framework to the minimal closure. Specializing to differential fields, the Picard-Vessiot closure tower $K^{PV_{\infty}}$ is normal and minimal over $K$, every normal intermediate differential field is an iterated PV extension, and a canonical Galois correspondence with proalgebraic groups over $C_K$ is obtained, refining Magid's PV framework. The paper also analyzes exact sequences $1\to N\to G\to H\to 1$ with $G=Aut(K_2/K)$ and shows conjugation by $G$-elements yields proalgebraic automorphisms of $N$, with left translations becoming proalgebraic morphisms when $G\cong N\rtimes H$. By connecting Kamensky–Pillay's bitorsor framework to intrinsic Galois groups $H_L$, the work provides a coherent bridge between differential Galois theory and stability-theoretic Galois correspondences, and clarifies the structure of PV towers.

Abstract

We work in the context of a complete totally transcendental theory $T = T^{eq}$. We consider the prime model $M_{A}$ over a set $A$. For intermediate sets $B$ with $A\subseteq B \subseteq M_{A}$ which are normal ($Aut(M_{A}/A)$-invariant) and ``minimal" we give a full Galois correspondence between intermediate definably closed sets $A\subseteq B \subseteq M_{A}$ and ``closed" subgroups of $Aut(B/A)$ (the group of $A$-elementary permutations of $B$). The unique greatest such minimal normal $B$ coincides with Poizat's ``minimal closure" $A_{min}$, so our paper extends (from $acl(A)$ to $A_{min}$) the well-known Galois correspondence between closed subgroups of the profinite group $Aut(acl(A)/A)$ and intermediate definably closed sets. The main result applies to the ``Picard-Vessiot closure" $K^{PV_{\infty}}$ of a differential field $K$ of char $0$ with algebraically closed field $C_{K}$ of constants. We also show that normal differential subfields of $K^{PV_{\infty}}$ containing $K$ are ``iterated $PV$-extensions" of $K$, and the Galois correspondence above holds for these extensions. This fills in some missing parts of Magid's paper [5]. We also discuss exact sequences $1 \to N \to G \to H \to 1$, where $G = Aut(K_2/K)$, $N = Aut(K_2/K_1)$ and $H = Aut(K_1/K)$, $K_1$ is a (maybe infinite type) $PV$ extension of $K$, $K_2$ is a (maybe infinite type) $PV$ extension of $K_1$ and $K_2$ is normal over $K$ and again $C_K$ is algebraically closed. Both $N$ and $H$ have the structure of proalgebraic groups over $C_K$. We show that conjugation by any given element of $G$ is a proalgebraic automorphism of $N$. Moreover if $G$ splits as a semidirect product $N\rtimes H$, then left multiplication by any fixed element of $G$ is a morphism of proalgebraic varieties $N\times H \to N\times H$. This improves and extends observations in Section 4 of [5] which dealt with one example.

Galois theory, automorphism groups of prime models, and the Picard-Vessiot closure

TL;DR

We address the synthesis of Galois theory within a model-theoretic setting: a full Galois correspondence is established for prime models over and minimal normal intermediate , tying definable closures to closed subgroups of and extending Poizat's framework to the minimal closure. Specializing to differential fields, the Picard-Vessiot closure tower is normal and minimal over , every normal intermediate differential field is an iterated PV extension, and a canonical Galois correspondence with proalgebraic groups over is obtained, refining Magid's PV framework. The paper also analyzes exact sequences with and shows conjugation by -elements yields proalgebraic automorphisms of , with left translations becoming proalgebraic morphisms when . By connecting Kamensky–Pillay's bitorsor framework to intrinsic Galois groups , the work provides a coherent bridge between differential Galois theory and stability-theoretic Galois correspondences, and clarifies the structure of PV towers.

Abstract

We work in the context of a complete totally transcendental theory . We consider the prime model over a set . For intermediate sets with which are normal (-invariant) and ``minimal" we give a full Galois correspondence between intermediate definably closed sets and ``closed" subgroups of (the group of -elementary permutations of ). The unique greatest such minimal normal coincides with Poizat's ``minimal closure" , so our paper extends (from to ) the well-known Galois correspondence between closed subgroups of the profinite group and intermediate definably closed sets. The main result applies to the ``Picard-Vessiot closure" of a differential field of char with algebraically closed field of constants. We also show that normal differential subfields of containing are ``iterated -extensions" of , and the Galois correspondence above holds for these extensions. This fills in some missing parts of Magid's paper [5]. We also discuss exact sequences , where , and , is a (maybe infinite type) extension of , is a (maybe infinite type) extension of and is normal over and again is algebraically closed. Both and have the structure of proalgebraic groups over . We show that conjugation by any given element of is a proalgebraic automorphism of . Moreover if splits as a semidirect product , then left multiplication by any fixed element of is a morphism of proalgebraic varieties . This improves and extends observations in Section 4 of [5] which dealt with one example.
Paper Structure (4 sections, 19 theorems, 2 equations)

This paper contains 4 sections, 19 theorems, 2 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Suppose that $A\subseteq B \subseteq M_{A}$ where $B$ is normal (over $A$ in $M_{A})$ and minimal. Then there is a Galois correspondence between closed subgroups of $Aut(B/A)$ and sets $C$ with $A\subseteq C \subseteq B$.

Theorems & Definitions (40)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Proposition 1.2
  • Proposition 1.3
  • Proposition 1.4
  • Definition 2.1
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • Remark 2.3
  • Definition 2.4
  • Lemma 2.5
  • ...and 30 more