Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Connecting Max-entropy With Computational Geometry, LP And SDP

Jean B Lasserre

TL;DR

The paper establishes a rigorous bridge between maximum entropy (KL-Maxent) problems with generalized moment constraints and canonical linear and semidefinite programs. By leveraging Federer's coarea formula, it shows that, when the number of moment constraints $m$ is at most the ambient dimension $d$, the KL-Maxent objective $\Theta(y)$ is the Cramér transform of a $(d-m)$-dimensional density $v$—the density of the pushforward $\mathbf{h}_\#P$. It then proves that, with appropriate reference measures, the perspective $\varepsilon\Theta(y/\varepsilon)$ coincides (up to constants) with the log-barrier formulations of the dual LP (and SDP) as $\varepsilon\to 0$, thereby recovering the LP (or SDP) optimum values in the limit. The results unify optimization and integration perspectives, revealing a concrete computational pathway from entropy-based methods to standard convex optimization tools, with explicit representations for the partition function via $\mathcal{L}_v$. These connections also provide constructive interpretations of $Z(\lambda)$ and offer potential computational avenues through known geometry-based formulas (e.g., Brion–Vergnes) for the LP case.

Abstract

We consider the well-known max-(relative) entropy problem $Θ$(y) = infQ$\ll$P DKL(Q P ) with Kullback-Leibler divergence on a domain $Ω$ $\subset$ R d , and with ''moment'' constraints h dQ = y, y $\in$ R m . We show that when m $\le$ d, $Θ$ is the Cram{é}r transform of a function v that solves a simply related computational geometry problem. Also, and remarkably, to the canonical LP: min x$\ge$0 {c T x\,: A x = y}, with A $\in$ R mxd , one may associate a max-entropy problem with a suitably chosen reference measure P on R d + and linear mapping h(x) = Ax, such that its associated perspective function $ε$ $Θ$(y/$ε$) is the optimal value of the log-barrier formulation (with parameter $ε$) of the dual LP (and so it converges to the LP optimal value as $ε$ $\rightarrow$ 0). An analogous result also holds for the canonical SDP: min X 0 { C, X\,: A(X) = y }.

Connecting Max-entropy With Computational Geometry, LP And SDP

TL;DR

The paper establishes a rigorous bridge between maximum entropy (KL-Maxent) problems with generalized moment constraints and canonical linear and semidefinite programs. By leveraging Federer's coarea formula, it shows that, when the number of moment constraints is at most the ambient dimension , the KL-Maxent objective is the Cramér transform of a -dimensional density —the density of the pushforward . It then proves that, with appropriate reference measures, the perspective coincides (up to constants) with the log-barrier formulations of the dual LP (and SDP) as , thereby recovering the LP (or SDP) optimum values in the limit. The results unify optimization and integration perspectives, revealing a concrete computational pathway from entropy-based methods to standard convex optimization tools, with explicit representations for the partition function via . These connections also provide constructive interpretations of and offer potential computational avenues through known geometry-based formulas (e.g., Brion–Vergnes) for the LP case.

Abstract

We consider the well-known max-(relative) entropy problem (y) = infQP DKL(Q P ) with Kullback-Leibler divergence on a domain R d , and with ''moment'' constraints h dQ = y, y R m . We show that when m d, is the Cram{é}r transform of a function v that solves a simply related computational geometry problem. Also, and remarkably, to the canonical LP: min x0 {c T x\,: A x = y}, with A R mxd , one may associate a max-entropy problem with a suitably chosen reference measure P on R d + and linear mapping h(x) = Ax, such that its associated perspective function (y/) is the optimal value of the log-barrier formulation (with parameter ) of the dual LP (and so it converges to the LP optimal value as 0). An analogous result also holds for the canonical SDP: min X 0 { C, X\,: A(X) = y }.
Paper Structure (9 sections, 7 theorems, 71 equations)

This paper contains 9 sections, 7 theorems, 71 equations.

Key Result

Proposition 3.2

Let Assumption ass-1 hold, with $P$ a finite measure on $\mathbf{\Omega}$ with density $p$ w.r.t. Lebesgue measure. The measure $V(d\mathbf{y})=v(\mathbf{y})d\mathbf{y}$ on $\mathbb{R}^m$ with $v$ as in def-v, is the pushforward $\mathbf{h}_\#P$ of $P$ by the mapping $\mathbf{h}$. In particular, if

Theorems & Definitions (16)

  • Remark
  • Proposition 3.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 3.3
  • proof
  • Theorem 3.4
  • proof
  • Theorem 4.1
  • proof
  • Example 4.1
  • ...and 6 more