Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Toward Maturity-Based Certification of Embodied AI: Quantifying Trustworthiness Through Measurement Mechanisms

Michael C. Darling, Alan H. Hesu, Michael A. Mardikes, Brian C. McGuigan, Reed M. Milewicz

TL;DR

The paper addresses the challenge of certifying trustworthiness for embodied AI by proposing a maturity-based assessment framework that translates abstract trustworthiness concepts into measurable evidence across the development lifecycle. It centers on measurement mechanisms, using uncertainty quantification (UQ) as a concrete exemplar, and maps these mechanisms to NIST trustworthiness characteristics to enable holistic certification. A motivating UAS detection case study demonstrates how a closed-loop synthetic data generation pipeline guided by uncertainty can improve robustness and provide actionable runtime safeguards. The work outlines a research agenda and highlights open questions on mechanism design, maturity mapping, and integration with formal methods, aiming to enable safe and certifiable deployment of embodied AI systems.

Abstract

We propose a maturity-based framework for certifying embodied AI systems through explicit measurement mechanisms. We argue that certifiable embodied AI requires structured assessment frameworks, quantitative scoring mechanisms, and methods for navigating multi-objective trade-offs inherent in trustworthiness evaluation. We demonstrate this approach using uncertainty quantification as an exemplar measurement mechanism and illustrate feasibility through an Uncrewed Aircraft System (UAS) detection case study.

Toward Maturity-Based Certification of Embodied AI: Quantifying Trustworthiness Through Measurement Mechanisms

TL;DR

The paper addresses the challenge of certifying trustworthiness for embodied AI by proposing a maturity-based assessment framework that translates abstract trustworthiness concepts into measurable evidence across the development lifecycle. It centers on measurement mechanisms, using uncertainty quantification (UQ) as a concrete exemplar, and maps these mechanisms to NIST trustworthiness characteristics to enable holistic certification. A motivating UAS detection case study demonstrates how a closed-loop synthetic data generation pipeline guided by uncertainty can improve robustness and provide actionable runtime safeguards. The work outlines a research agenda and highlights open questions on mechanism design, maturity mapping, and integration with formal methods, aiming to enable safe and certifiable deployment of embodied AI systems.

Abstract

We propose a maturity-based framework for certifying embodied AI systems through explicit measurement mechanisms. We argue that certifiable embodied AI requires structured assessment frameworks, quantitative scoring mechanisms, and methods for navigating multi-objective trade-offs inherent in trustworthiness evaluation. We demonstrate this approach using uncertainty quantification as an exemplar measurement mechanism and illustrate feasibility through an Uncrewed Aircraft System (UAS) detection case study.
Paper Structure (13 sections)