Aligning Findings with Diagnosis: A Self-Consistent Reinforcement Learning Framework for Trustworthy Radiology Reporting
Kun Zhao, Siyuan Dai, Pan Wang, Jifeng Song, Hui Ji, Chenghua Lin, Liang Zhan, Haoteng Tang
TL;DR
The paper addresses the challenge of trustworthy radiology report generation with Multimodal LLMs, where architectural heterogeneity and factual hallucinations hinder clinical deployment. It introduces a two-phase approach: Phase I systematically optimizes the vision encoder–LLM backbone to identify a strong foundation, and Phase II implements a self-consistent reinforcement learning framework with a think–then–summarize generation structure guided by a multi-component reward (consistency, reasoning accuracy, diagnostic accuracy, semantic fidelity, and format compliance) using GRPO. This framework yields state-of-the-art clinical efficacy on MIMIC-CXR with significantly reduced hallucinations by enforcing alignment between the descriptive findings and structured diagnostic outputs. The work demonstrates that explicit reasoning–diagnosis alignment and domain-specific visual representations are crucial for trustworthy radiology reporting, with practical implications for safer clinical translation and future enhancements in connector architectures and consistency-driven training for medical MLLMs.
Abstract
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown strong potential for radiology report generation, yet their clinical translation is hindered by architectural heterogeneity and the prevalence of factual hallucinations. Standard supervised fine-tuning often fails to strictly align linguistic outputs with visual evidence, while existing reinforcement learning approaches struggle with either prohibitive computational costs or limited exploration. To address these challenges, we propose a comprehensive framework for self-consistent radiology report generation. First, we conduct a systematic evaluation to identify optimal vision encoder and LLM backbone configurations for medical imaging. Building on this foundation, we introduce a novel "Reason-then-Summarize" architecture optimized via Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO). This framework restructures generation into two distinct components: a think block for detailed findings and an answer block for structured disease labels. By utilizing a multi-dimensional composite reward function, we explicitly penalize logical discrepancies between the generated narrative and the final diagnosis. Extensive experiments on the MIMIC-CXR benchmark demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance in clinical efficacy metrics and significantly reduces hallucinations compared to strong supervised baselines.
