Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Average gradient localisation for degenerate elliptic equations in the plane

Thibault Lacombe

TL;DR

This work studies regularity for planar degenerate elliptic equations of the form $\operatorname{div}(G(\nabla u))=0$ with $G$ continuous and strictly monotone. By combining a robust approximation scheme, localisation lemmas, and a topological analysis of the ellipticity/degeneracy sets $\mathcal{D}$ and $\mathcal{S}$, the authors prove a sharp dichotomy: at any point either $u$ is $C^1$ or any blow-up's gradient lies in $\mathcal{D}\cap\mathcal{S}$ a.e., and $\operatorname{dist}(\nabla u, \mathcal{D}\cap\mathcal{S})$ is approximately continuous. The results remove previous structural assumptions on the bad set, are two-dimensional in nature with zero right-hand side, and build on and extend the localisation framework of DSS and LacLam. The findings provide a precise description of blow-up limits and a near-continuity property for the distance to the degenerate/singular set, advancing the understanding of regularity for highly degenerate elliptic equations in the plane.

Abstract

We consider Lipschitz solutions to the possibly highly degenerate elliptic equation $ {\rm div} G(\nabla u)=0$ in $B_1\subset\mathbb{R}^2 $, for any continuous strictly monotone vector field $G \colon \mathbb{R}^2 \to \mathbb{R}^2$. We show that $u$ is either $C^1$ at $0$, or any blowup limit $v(x)=\lim \frac{u(δx)-u(0)}δ $ along a sequence $δ\to 0$ satisfies $ \nabla v\in \mathcal{D}\cap \mathcal{S} \text{ a.e} $. Here, $ \mathcal{D}$ and $\mathcal{S}$ can be roughly interpreted as the sets where ellipticity degenerates from below and above, that is, the symmetric parts of $ \nabla G$ and $(\nabla G)^{-1}$ have a zero eigenvalue. This is a strong indication in favor of the expected continuity of $H(\nabla u)$ for any continuous $H$ vanishing on $\mathcal{D}\cap \mathcal{S}$. In contrast with previous results in the same spirit, we do not make any assumption on the structure of $G$ besides its continuity and strict monotony.

Average gradient localisation for degenerate elliptic equations in the plane

TL;DR

This work studies regularity for planar degenerate elliptic equations of the form with continuous and strictly monotone. By combining a robust approximation scheme, localisation lemmas, and a topological analysis of the ellipticity/degeneracy sets and , the authors prove a sharp dichotomy: at any point either is or any blow-up's gradient lies in a.e., and is approximately continuous. The results remove previous structural assumptions on the bad set, are two-dimensional in nature with zero right-hand side, and build on and extend the localisation framework of DSS and LacLam. The findings provide a precise description of blow-up limits and a near-continuity property for the distance to the degenerate/singular set, advancing the understanding of regularity for highly degenerate elliptic equations in the plane.

Abstract

We consider Lipschitz solutions to the possibly highly degenerate elliptic equation in , for any continuous strictly monotone vector field . We show that is either at , or any blowup limit along a sequence satisfies . Here, and can be roughly interpreted as the sets where ellipticity degenerates from below and above, that is, the symmetric parts of and have a zero eigenvalue. This is a strong indication in favor of the expected continuity of for any continuous vanishing on . In contrast with previous results in the same spirit, we do not make any assumption on the structure of besides its continuity and strict monotony.
Paper Structure (16 sections, 26 theorems, 130 equations)

This paper contains 16 sections, 26 theorems, 130 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $G:{\mathbb R}^2 \to {\mathbb R}^2$ strictly monotone, continuous and let $u : B_1 \to {\mathbb R}$ a Lipschitz solution of equation div. Then, for any $x \in B_1$, either $x \mapsto \mathop{\mathrm{dist}}\nolimits(\nabla u(x),\mathcal{D}\cap\mathcal{S})$ is continuous at $x$, or it holds

Theorems & Definitions (42)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Corollary 1.2
  • Theorem 2.1
  • Lemma 2.2
  • Lemma 2.3
  • Lemma 2.4
  • Lemma 2.5
  • Lemma 3.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 3.2
  • ...and 32 more