VAR RL Done Right: Tackling Asynchronous Policy Conflicts in Visual Autoregressive Generation
Shikun Sun, Liao Qu, Huichao Zhang, Yiheng Liu, Yangyang Song, Xian Li, Xu Wang, Yi Jiang, Daniel K. Du, Xinglong Wu, Jia Jia
TL;DR
The paper addresses the instability of reinforcement learning in Visual AutoRegressive (VAR) generation caused by asynchronous policy conflicts across multi-scale token grids. It introduces a principled framework to enhance Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) using Value as Middle Return (VMR), Per-Action Normalization Weighting (PANW), and Mask Propagation (MP), preserving policy optimality while stabilizing credit assignment. The authors provide theoretical results showing two-stage invariance within the VAR policy family and demonstrate substantial empirical gains on text rendering and human-preference metrics, outperforming vanilla GRPO and diffusion-based baselines. This work enables robust RL alignment for VAR models, yielding higher sample quality and better objective alignment in high-resolution text-to-image generation. Overall, the method advances reliable, scalable RL for multi-scale, parallel token generation in visual synthesis.
Abstract
Visual generation is dominated by three paradigms: AutoRegressive (AR), diffusion, and Visual AutoRegressive (VAR) models. Unlike AR and diffusion, VARs operate on heterogeneous input structures across their generation steps, which creates severe asynchronous policy conflicts. This issue becomes particularly acute in reinforcement learning (RL) scenarios, leading to unstable training and suboptimal alignment. To resolve this, we propose a novel framework to enhance Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) by explicitly managing these conflicts. Our method integrates three synergistic components: 1) a stabilizing intermediate reward to guide early-stage generation; 2) a dynamic time-step reweighting scheme for precise credit assignment; and 3) a novel mask propagation algorithm, derived from principles of Reward Feedback Learning (ReFL), designed to isolate optimization effects both spatially and temporally. Our approach demonstrates significant improvements in sample quality and objective alignment over the vanilla GRPO baseline, enabling robust and effective optimization for VAR models.
