Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Prior Diffusiveness and Regret in the Linear-Gaussian Bandit

Yifan Zhu, John C. Duchi, Benjamin Van Roy

TL;DR

This work analyzes Thompson sampling in the linear-Gaussian bandit with Gaussian prior on the coefficient vector, showing that the Bayesian regret decouples into an additive burn-in term and the long-run minimax rate: $\text{Reg}(T)=\widetilde{O}(\sigma d\sqrt{T} + d r \sqrt{\mathrm{Tr}(\Sigma_0)})$. A new generalized elliptical potential lemma provides a flexible tool to bound the cumulative posterior-uncertainty contributions, enabling a tight split between initial exploration (burn-in) and asymptotic performance. The authors also establish a prior-dependent lower bound indicating the burn-in term is unavoidable in general and extend the results to strongly log-concave priors and noise distributions. Overall, the paper clarifies how prior diffusiveness affects regret and demonstrates additive burn-in behavior that improves upon previous multiplicative bounds, with implications for prior design in Bayesian bandits.

Abstract

We prove that Thompson sampling exhibits $\tilde{O}(σd \sqrt{T} + d r \sqrt{\mathrm{Tr}(Σ_0)})$ Bayesian regret in the linear-Gaussian bandit with a $\mathcal{N}(μ_0, Σ_0)$ prior distribution on the coefficients, where $d$ is the dimension, $T$ is the time horizon, $r$ is the maximum $\ell_2$ norm of the actions, and $σ^2$ is the noise variance. In contrast to existing regret bounds, this shows that to within logarithmic factors, the prior-dependent ``burn-in'' term $d r \sqrt{\mathrm{Tr}(Σ_0)}$ decouples additively from the minimax (long run) regret $σd \sqrt{T}$. Previous regret bounds exhibit a multiplicative dependence on these terms. We establish these results via a new ``elliptical potential'' lemma, and also provide a lower bound indicating that the burn-in term is unavoidable.

Prior Diffusiveness and Regret in the Linear-Gaussian Bandit

TL;DR

This work analyzes Thompson sampling in the linear-Gaussian bandit with Gaussian prior on the coefficient vector, showing that the Bayesian regret decouples into an additive burn-in term and the long-run minimax rate: . A new generalized elliptical potential lemma provides a flexible tool to bound the cumulative posterior-uncertainty contributions, enabling a tight split between initial exploration (burn-in) and asymptotic performance. The authors also establish a prior-dependent lower bound indicating the burn-in term is unavoidable in general and extend the results to strongly log-concave priors and noise distributions. Overall, the paper clarifies how prior diffusiveness affects regret and demonstrates additive burn-in behavior that improves upon previous multiplicative bounds, with implications for prior design in Bayesian bandits.

Abstract

We prove that Thompson sampling exhibits Bayesian regret in the linear-Gaussian bandit with a prior distribution on the coefficients, where is the dimension, is the time horizon, is the maximum norm of the actions, and is the noise variance. In contrast to existing regret bounds, this shows that to within logarithmic factors, the prior-dependent ``burn-in'' term decouples additively from the minimax (long run) regret . Previous regret bounds exhibit a multiplicative dependence on these terms. We establish these results via a new ``elliptical potential'' lemma, and also provide a lower bound indicating that the burn-in term is unavoidable.
Paper Structure (17 sections, 14 theorems, 98 equations)

This paper contains 17 sections, 14 theorems, 98 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Let the preceding assumptions and constant definitions hold. Then Thompson sampling satisfies the Bayesian regret bound

Theorems & Definitions (21)

  • Theorem 1
  • Corollary 2
  • proof
  • Lemma 3: Generalized elliptical potential lemma
  • Lemma 4: Elliptical potentials, Proposition 2 of AbeilleLa17
  • Lemma 5
  • proof
  • Theorem 6
  • Corollary 7
  • Corollary 8
  • ...and 11 more