Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Heavy tails in dynamic flow networks: Universal explanation of their emergence

Agnieszka Janicka, Fiona Sloothaak, Maria Vlasiou, Bert Zwart

TL;DR

This work provides a universal, analytically tractable framework for overload cascades in multi-commodity flow networks, showing that heavy-tailed cascade costs inherit their Pareto tails from Pareto-tailed external inputs. Central to the theory are the catastrophe principle and a transformation linking input tail exponent $\alpha$ to output tail exponent $\alpha/\delta$ under $\delta$-scale-invariant, SRC cascade costs and cascade probabilities. The authors instantiate the framework with concrete flow/production/cascade-cost choices, proving satisfiability across centralized and decentralized settings and deriving tail behavior for power grids, traffic networks, and processing systems. The results unify previously domain-specific explanations and offer a broad, robust explanation for scale-free disruptions, with practical implications for capacity planning and targeted resilience interventions.

Abstract

Overload-induced cascading failures can cause extreme disruptions in a wide range of networked systems, such as power grids, transportation networks, or financial systems. Empirical studies across domains report that the size of such disruptions often follows a Pareto- or heavy-tailed distribution. While many models reproduce this scaling behavior, they are either tailored to specific domains or based on simplified mechanisms that overlook key aspects of overload cascading behavior. Hence, a general understanding of the mechanisms driving scale-free behavior in these settings remains incomplete. In this paper, we develop a universal and analytically tractable model of overload cascading failures on flow networks, offering a new perspective on how Pareto-tailed disruptions emerge across networks. Our framework shows, under mild assumptions, that heavy-tailed disruptions can arise naturally from Pareto-tailed external inputs, and it establishes a transformation law linking the input and output tail exponents. We further identify broad conditions under which the resulting cascade cost exhibits a heavy-tailed distribution and show that the mechanism is robust across several domains, including power transmission, traffic networks, and processing systems. Our results provide a unified explanation for the emergence of scale-free failures in overload-driven systems and connect previously disparate, application-specific models under a unified framework.

Heavy tails in dynamic flow networks: Universal explanation of their emergence

TL;DR

This work provides a universal, analytically tractable framework for overload cascades in multi-commodity flow networks, showing that heavy-tailed cascade costs inherit their Pareto tails from Pareto-tailed external inputs. Central to the theory are the catastrophe principle and a transformation linking input tail exponent to output tail exponent under -scale-invariant, SRC cascade costs and cascade probabilities. The authors instantiate the framework with concrete flow/production/cascade-cost choices, proving satisfiability across centralized and decentralized settings and deriving tail behavior for power grids, traffic networks, and processing systems. The results unify previously domain-specific explanations and offer a broad, robust explanation for scale-free disruptions, with practical implications for capacity planning and targeted resilience interventions.

Abstract

Overload-induced cascading failures can cause extreme disruptions in a wide range of networked systems, such as power grids, transportation networks, or financial systems. Empirical studies across domains report that the size of such disruptions often follows a Pareto- or heavy-tailed distribution. While many models reproduce this scaling behavior, they are either tailored to specific domains or based on simplified mechanisms that overlook key aspects of overload cascading behavior. Hence, a general understanding of the mechanisms driving scale-free behavior in these settings remains incomplete. In this paper, we develop a universal and analytically tractable model of overload cascading failures on flow networks, offering a new perspective on how Pareto-tailed disruptions emerge across networks. Our framework shows, under mild assumptions, that heavy-tailed disruptions can arise naturally from Pareto-tailed external inputs, and it establishes a transformation law linking the input and output tail exponents. We further identify broad conditions under which the resulting cascade cost exhibits a heavy-tailed distribution and show that the mechanism is robust across several domains, including power transmission, traffic networks, and processing systems. Our results provide a unified explanation for the emergence of scale-free failures in overload-driven systems and connect previously disparate, application-specific models under a unified framework.
Paper Structure (30 sections, 15 theorems, 166 equations, 2 figures, 2 tables)

This paper contains 30 sections, 15 theorems, 166 equations, 2 figures, 2 tables.

Key Result

Proposition 1

Suppose that Assumption assumption holds for some $\delta>0$. Fix $\varepsilon>0$, and let $\overrightarrow{\mkern-4mu X }_{\mkern-7mu\max}$ be the largest weight amoung all vertices, i.e., $\overrightarrow{\mkern-4mu X }_{\mkern-7mu\max} = \max_{1\leq i\leq |\mathcal{V}|}\{\overrightarrow{\mkern-4m where $\alpha>0$ is the tail parameter of $\overrightarrow{\mkern-4mu X }\mkern-2mu$ as given in de

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: Example of a small processing network. Here, red, black, and blue vertices correspond to the origin, processing, and destination vertices, respectively.
  • Figure 2: Optimal flow $\bm{F}^*(\bm{U}(\eta))$ on the $K_4$ graph for different values of parameter $\eta$. In each case, one unit of flow needs to be transferred to vertex 1 (green). Depending on the value of $\eta$, the flow originates from vertex 2 and/or 3 (orange). Negative flows represent movement opposite to the direction of the edge.

Theorems & Definitions (32)

  • Proposition 1: Catastrophe principle
  • Theorem 2: Tail of the cascade cost
  • Remark 1
  • Proposition 3
  • Proposition 4
  • Lemma 5
  • proof
  • proof
  • Lemma 6
  • proof
  • ...and 22 more