Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A multi-self model of self-punishment

Angelo Enrico Petralia

TL;DR

The paper introduces a multi-self model of choice in which a DM may punish herself by distorting her true preferences through harmful distortions that move the top $i$ alternatives to the bottom in reverse order. It defines Harm($\rhd$) and the degree of self-punishment $sp(c)$, and provides necessary and sufficient axioms and characterizations for estimating $sp(c)$ from observed choices, including weakly and strongly harmful regimes. It shows that weakly harmful behavior captures common biases such as second-best procedures and decoy effects, while strongly harmful behavior, which corresponds to maximal self-punishment, becomes increasingly prevalent as the choice set grows, culminating in an inconsistency characterization. The framework sits within the multi-self literature, offering testable restrictions and partial identification of the underlying preferences, and points to stochastic, context-sensitive, and dynamic extensions for future work.

Abstract

We investigate the choice of a decision maker (DM) who harms herself, by maximizing in each menu some distortion of her true preference, in which the first i alternatives are moved, in reverse order, to the bottom. This pattern has no empirical power, but it allows to define a degree of self-punishment, which measures the extent of the denial of pleasure adopted by the DM. We characterize irrational choices displaying the lowest degree of self-punishment, and we fully identify the preferences that explain the DM's picks by a minimal denial of pleasure. These datasets account for some well known selection biases, such as second-best procedures, and the handicapped avoidance. Necessary and sufficient conditions for the estimation of the degree of self-punishment of a choice are singled out. Moreover the linear orders whose harmful distortions justify choice data are partially elicited. Finally, we offer a simple characterization of the choice behavior that exhibits the highest degree of self-punishment, and we show that this subclass comprises almost all choices.

A multi-self model of self-punishment

TL;DR

The paper introduces a multi-self model of choice in which a DM may punish herself by distorting her true preferences through harmful distortions that move the top alternatives to the bottom in reverse order. It defines Harm() and the degree of self-punishment , and provides necessary and sufficient axioms and characterizations for estimating from observed choices, including weakly and strongly harmful regimes. It shows that weakly harmful behavior captures common biases such as second-best procedures and decoy effects, while strongly harmful behavior, which corresponds to maximal self-punishment, becomes increasingly prevalent as the choice set grows, culminating in an inconsistency characterization. The framework sits within the multi-self literature, offering testable restrictions and partial identification of the underlying preferences, and points to stochastic, context-sensitive, and dynamic extensions for future work.

Abstract

We investigate the choice of a decision maker (DM) who harms herself, by maximizing in each menu some distortion of her true preference, in which the first i alternatives are moved, in reverse order, to the bottom. This pattern has no empirical power, but it allows to define a degree of self-punishment, which measures the extent of the denial of pleasure adopted by the DM. We characterize irrational choices displaying the lowest degree of self-punishment, and we fully identify the preferences that explain the DM's picks by a minimal denial of pleasure. These datasets account for some well known selection biases, such as second-best procedures, and the handicapped avoidance. Necessary and sufficient conditions for the estimation of the degree of self-punishment of a choice are singled out. Moreover the linear orders whose harmful distortions justify choice data are partially elicited. Finally, we offer a simple characterization of the choice behavior that exhibits the highest degree of self-punishment, and we show that this subclass comprises almost all choices.
Paper Structure (8 sections, 18 theorems, 6 equations)

This paper contains 8 sections, 18 theorems, 6 equations.

Key Result

Lemma 1

Let $c\colon \mathscr{X}\to X$ be a choice on $X$. For any linear order $\rhd\in \mathsf{LO}(X)$, there is a rationalization by self-punishment $\mathsf{Harm}_c(\rhd)$ of $c$ by $\rhd$.

Theorems & Definitions (41)

  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Example 3
  • Definition 1: Samuelson1938
  • Definition 2
  • Definition 3
  • Definition 4
  • Lemma 1
  • Definition 5
  • Remark 1
  • ...and 31 more