SPoRC-VIST: A Benchmark for Evaluating Generative Natural Narrative in Vision-Language Models
Yunlin Zeng
TL;DR
This work introduces SPoRC-VIST, a benchmark that trains on synthetic imagery derived from high-quality podcast transcripts (SPoRC) and evaluates on real VIST image sequences to study visual narrative generation. By fine-tuning a relatively compact Qwen3-VL-32B model with LoRA and NEFTune, the authors achieve richer, more natural podcast-style dialogues that maintain visual grounding, outperforming a much larger base model in conversational depth and perceived naturalness. The paper also proposes novel style metrics (average turn length, speaker switch rate) and an AI-as-a-Judge evaluation paradigm, demonstrating robust generalization to real images and offering a more task-relevant assessment than traditional n-gram metrics. These contributions advance open-ended multimodal storytelling and provide practical benchmarks and evaluation methods for future VLMs in creative, narrative-driven tasks.
Abstract
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have achieved remarkable success in descriptive tasks such as image captioning and visual question answering (VQA). However, their ability to generate engaging, long-form narratives -- specifically multi-speaker podcast dialogues -- remains under-explored and difficult to evaluate. Standard metrics like BLEU and ROUGE fail to capture the nuances of conversational naturalness, personality, and narrative flow, often rewarding safe, repetitive outputs over engaging storytelling. In this work, we present a novel pipeline for end-to-end visual podcast generation, and fine-tune a Qwen3-VL-32B model on a curated dataset of 4,000 image-dialogue pairs. Crucially, we use a synthetic-to-real training strategy: we train on high-quality podcast dialogues from the Structured Podcast Research Corpus (SPoRC) paired with synthetically generated imagery, and evaluate on real-world photo sequences from the Visual Storytelling Dataset (VIST). This rigorous setup tests the model's ability to generalize from synthetic training data to real-world visual domains. We propose a comprehensive evaluation framework that moves beyond textual overlap, and use AI-as-a-judge (Gemini 3 Pro, Claude Opus 4.5, GPT 5.2) and novel style metrics (average turn length, speaker switch rate) to assess quality. Our experiments demonstrate that our fine-tuned 32B model significantly outperforms a 235B base model in conversational naturalness ($>$80\% win rate) and narrative depth (+50\% turn length), while maintaining identical visual grounding capabilities (CLIPScore: 20.39).
