Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On the Largest Convexity Number of Co-Finite Sets in the Plane

Chaya Keller, Micha A. Perles

TL;DR

This work determines the extremal convexity number for cofinite planar sets $X=\mathbb{R}^2\setminus P$, focusing on $P$ in convex or general position. The authors introduce and relate several covering and encapsulation variants ($cov$, $enc$, and their disjoint forms) and prove tight bounds in the convex-position case: $enc(P)=cov(P)=\left\lfloor\frac{n+5}{2}\right\rfloor-\delta(n)$ with $\delta(n)=1$ for $n\in\{0,1,3\}$, while $enc_{\circ}(P)=cov_{\circ}(P)=\left\lfloor\frac{2n+5}{3}\right\rfloor$; in general position, they obtain linear upper bounds $enc(P),cov(P)\leq\frac{7n}{11}+4$ and $enc_{\circ}(n)=cov_{\circ}(n)\leq\left\lfloor\frac{2n+5}{3}\right\rfloor$. These results resolve the convex- and disjoint-setting questions posed by Lawrence and Morris and provide a structural framework for how removing finite point sets controls unions of convex covers.

Abstract

The convexity number of a set $X \subset \mathbb{R}^2$ is the minimum number of convex subsets required to cover it. We study the following question: what is the largest possible convexity number $f(n)$ of $\mathbb{R}^2 \setminus S$, where $S$ is a set of $n$ points in general position in the plane? We prove that for all $n \geq 4$, $\lfloor\frac{n+5}{2}\rfloor \leq f(n) \leq \frac{7n+44}{11}$. We also show that for every $n \geq 4$, if the points of $S$ are in convex position then the convexity number of $\mathbb{R}^2 \setminus S$ is $\lfloor\frac{n+5}{2}\rfloor$. This solves a problem of Lawrence and Morris [Finite sets as complements of finite unions of convex sets, Disc. Comput. Geom. 42 (2009), 206-218].

On the Largest Convexity Number of Co-Finite Sets in the Plane

TL;DR

This work determines the extremal convexity number for cofinite planar sets , focusing on in convex or general position. The authors introduce and relate several covering and encapsulation variants (, , and their disjoint forms) and prove tight bounds in the convex-position case: with for , while ; in general position, they obtain linear upper bounds and . These results resolve the convex- and disjoint-setting questions posed by Lawrence and Morris and provide a structural framework for how removing finite point sets controls unions of convex covers.

Abstract

The convexity number of a set is the minimum number of convex subsets required to cover it. We study the following question: what is the largest possible convexity number of , where is a set of points in general position in the plane? We prove that for all , . We also show that for every , if the points of are in convex position then the convexity number of is . This solves a problem of Lawrence and Morris [Finite sets as complements of finite unions of convex sets, Disc. Comput. Geom. 42 (2009), 206-218].
Paper Structure (4 sections, 6 theorems, 10 equations, 13 figures)

This paper contains 4 sections, 6 theorems, 10 equations, 13 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

In the above notation, the following holds:

Figures (13)

  • Figure 1: A diagram of our results. Each arrow represents a trivial '$\leq$' relation, where the parameter that corresponds to the tail of the arrow is smaller than or equal to the parameter the corresponds to the head of the arrow. Thm *=Proposition \ref{['cl:tightnesUB']}, Thm**=Proposition \ref{['cl:g_1UB']}, Thm***=Theorem \ref{['thm:encaps_comp_of_n']}, Thm****=Theorem \ref{['thm:cov(n)UB']}, Thm*****=Theorem \ref{['thm:cover_comp_of_n']}. The assertions of Theorem \ref{['thm:main']} follow from these results via the 'arrow' relations.
  • Figure 2: An illustration for the proof of Theorem \ref{['thm:encaps_comp_of_n']}.
  • Figure 3: An illustration for the proof of Theorem \ref{['thm:encaps_comp_of_n']}.
  • Figure 4: An illustration for the proof of Theorem \ref{['thm:encaps_comp_of_n']} -- case A.
  • Figure 5: An illustration for Case 1 in the proof of Proposition \ref{['cl:tightnesUB']} where $touch(K_2)=\{p_1,p_2\}$.
  • ...and 8 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (18)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Definition 2.1
  • Definition 2.2
  • Theorem 3.1
  • proof
  • Claim 3.2
  • proof : Proof of Claim \ref{['cl:n=5']}
  • proof
  • proof
  • Proposition 3.7
  • ...and 8 more