Table of Contents
Fetching ...

The Maximal Entanglement Limit in Statistical and High Energy Physics

Dmitri E. Kharzeev

Abstract

These lectures advocate the idea that quantum entanglement provides a unifying foundation for both statistical physics and high-energy interactions. I argue that, at sufficiently long times or high energies, most quantum systems approach a Maximal Entanglement Limit (MEL) in which phases of quantum states become unobservable, reduced density matrices acquire a thermal form, and probabilistic descriptions emerge without invoking ergodicity or classical randomness. Within this framework, the emergence of probabilistic parton model, thermalization in the break-up of confining strings and in high-energy collisions, and the universal small $x$ behavior of structure functions arise as direct consequences of entanglement and geometry of high-dimensional Hilbert space.

The Maximal Entanglement Limit in Statistical and High Energy Physics

Abstract

These lectures advocate the idea that quantum entanglement provides a unifying foundation for both statistical physics and high-energy interactions. I argue that, at sufficiently long times or high energies, most quantum systems approach a Maximal Entanglement Limit (MEL) in which phases of quantum states become unobservable, reduced density matrices acquire a thermal form, and probabilistic descriptions emerge without invoking ergodicity or classical randomness. Within this framework, the emergence of probabilistic parton model, thermalization in the break-up of confining strings and in high-energy collisions, and the universal small behavior of structure functions arise as direct consequences of entanglement and geometry of high-dimensional Hilbert space.
Paper Structure (37 sections, 126 equations, 11 figures)

This paper contains 37 sections, 126 equations, 11 figures.

Figures (11)

  • Figure 1: The bipartition of the system used to study the entanglement of the central region of length $L$ (subsystem $A$) with the complement (subsystem $B$). Subsystem $A$ is centered around the center of the system of size $N$. From Florio:2025hoc.
  • Figure 2: Entanglement spectrum in four different charge $Q$ sectors for a subsystem of size $L=12$ as a function of time (logarithms of eigenvalues are shown for legibility). Total size of the system is $N=100$, fermion coupling and mass are $g = 0.5/a, m = 0.5 g$. From Florio:2025hoc.
  • Figure 3: Top panel: time dependence of entanglement entropy $S(L)$ (times are shifted so that the jets cross the subsystem boundary at $t-t_\times=0$). Matching of the initial shape of the curves is the signature of an area law scaling of the entanglement entropy, expected for the ground state of a gapped theory. Bottom panel: vacuum--subtracted entanglement entropy per unit length, with the time shifted same as above. Different subsystem size curves reach a plateau at late times at the same value of entropy density, signifying the volume law of entanglement that signals thermalization. System parameters are $m=0.5 g, g=0.5/a$; values of $L$ are separated on the right and on the left panels due to staggering effects. From Florio:2025hoc.
  • Figure 4: Top panel: The temperature as a function of time extracted from the maximal normalized overlap (right) and minimal HS distance (left) for subintervals $L=4,8$ centered in the middle. Bottom panel: the value of the metric at the extremum shown in the top panel. For the thermal states we used $N_{\rm thermal}=12$ and traced down to $L$. From Florio:2025hoc.
  • Figure 5: Effective temperature $T$ found from the local observables, entanglement entropy, thermodynamic relation $s=(\epsilon+P)/T$ ($\epsilon$ and $P$ are the energy density and pressure) and maximizing the overlap between the reduced density matrix and a thermal density matrix. Fermion coupling and mass are $g=0.5/a$, $m=0.5\,g$. Temperature $T$ and time $t$ are defined in terms of the meson mass $M_S$. From Florio:2025hoc.
  • ...and 6 more figures