Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Pro-representability of Chow groups and Hodge numbers

Sen Yang

TL;DR

This work addresses when the infinitesimal deformations of Chow groups CH^{p}(X) are governed by a pro-representable functor. By leveraging Bloch's formula CH^{p}(X) \\otimes \\mathbb{Q} \\cong H^{p}(X, K^{M}_{p}(O_{X})) \\otimes \\mathbb{Q} and a de Rham–cyclic homology bridge, the authors derive a cohomological criterion: if certain Hodge groups H^{p}(X,\\Omega^{i}_{X/k}) vanish in a specified range, then the formal completion \\widehat{CH}^{p}(A) is isomorphic to H^{p}(X,\\Omega^{p-1}_{X/k}) \\otimes_{k} m_{A}, for A in Art_{k}. This yields pro-representability of \\widehat{CH}^{p} and unifies prior results for p=2 and p=3 under a single Hodge-vanishing condition. The approach connects the deformation theory of algebraic cycles with the Hodge structure of X through de Rham and cyclic homology, offering a practical criterion and illuminating the role of Hodge numbers in the pro-representation problem.

Abstract

Let $k$ be an algebraic field extension of $\mathbb{Q}$ and let $X$ be a smooth projective variety over $k$ of dimension $d \geq 2$. We study the pro-representability of the Chow group $CH^{p}(X)$ with $2 \leq p \leq d$. When certain Hodge numbers of $X$ vanish, namely, $H^{p}(X,Ω^{i}_{X/k})=H^{p+1}(X,Ω^{i}_{X/k})= \cdots =H^{2p-1-i}(X,Ω^{i}_{X/k})=0$ for $i$ such that $0 \leq i \leq p-2$, we prove that the formal completion $\widehat{CH}^{p}(A)$ of $CH^{p}(X)$ at a local augmented Artinian $k$-algebra $A$ with the maximal ideal $m_{A}$ satisfies \[ \widehat{CH}^{p}(A) \cong H^{p}(X, Ω^{p-1}_{X/ k})\otimes_{k}m_{A}. \]This provides a unified cohomological criterion for the pro-representability of the functor $\widehat{CH}^{p}$, generalizing earlier work by Bloch, Stienstra, and Mackall for $p=2$ and $p=3$. Our result reveals an intrinsic connection between the deformation theory of algebraic cycles and the Hodge structure of $X$.

Pro-representability of Chow groups and Hodge numbers

TL;DR

This work addresses when the infinitesimal deformations of Chow groups CH^{p}(X) are governed by a pro-representable functor. By leveraging Bloch's formula CH^{p}(X) \\otimes \\mathbb{Q} \\cong H^{p}(X, K^{M}_{p}(O_{X})) \\otimes \\mathbb{Q} and a de Rham–cyclic homology bridge, the authors derive a cohomological criterion: if certain Hodge groups H^{p}(X,\\Omega^{i}_{X/k}) vanish in a specified range, then the formal completion \\widehat{CH}^{p}(A) is isomorphic to H^{p}(X,\\Omega^{p-1}_{X/k}) \\otimes_{k} m_{A}, for A in Art_{k}. This yields pro-representability of \\widehat{CH}^{p} and unifies prior results for p=2 and p=3 under a single Hodge-vanishing condition. The approach connects the deformation theory of algebraic cycles with the Hodge structure of X through de Rham and cyclic homology, offering a practical criterion and illuminating the role of Hodge numbers in the pro-representation problem.

Abstract

Let be an algebraic field extension of and let be a smooth projective variety over of dimension . We study the pro-representability of the Chow group with . When certain Hodge numbers of vanish, namely, for such that , we prove that the formal completion of at a local augmented Artinian -algebra with the maximal ideal satisfies This provides a unified cohomological criterion for the pro-representability of the functor , generalizing earlier work by Bloch, Stienstra, and Mackall for and . Our result reveals an intrinsic connection between the deformation theory of algebraic cycles and the Hodge structure of .
Paper Structure (4 sections, 18 theorems, 117 equations)

This paper contains 4 sections, 18 theorems, 117 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $X$ be a smooth projective surface over an algebraic field extension $k$ of $\mathbb{Q}$, and suppose that $H^{2}(X,O_{X})=0$. Then, for any $A \in Art_{k}$, there is an isomorphism Consequently, the functor $\widehat{CH}^{2}$ is pro-representable, cf. eq: pro-rep vs.

Theorems & Definitions (29)

  • Theorem 1.1: Bl3
  • Conjecture 1.2: Bl3
  • Theorem 1.3: Ma
  • Theorem 1.5: cf. Theorem \ref{['t:yang']} below
  • Example 2.1: cf. remark from page 54 of Ha
  • Lemma 2.2: Gro1
  • proof
  • Theorem 2.3: cf. Theorem 4.2 of BO
  • Corollary 2.4: cf. Corollary 6.2 of BO
  • proof
  • ...and 19 more