Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Efficient implementation of single particle Hamiltonians in exponentially reduced qubit space

Martin Plesch, Martin Friák, Ijaz Ahamed Mohammad

TL;DR

The paper tackles the challenge of computing spectra for solid-state Hamiltonians on near-term quantum devices with limited qubits. It introduces a logarithmic-qubit encoding that maps an $N$-site Hamiltonian to $n=\lceil \log_2 N\rceil$ qubits, paired with a SES-based variational circuit and a Gray-code measurement protocol, underpinned by a volumetric efficiency metric. The key contributions are (i) a binary-encoded SES ansatz preserving the original parameterization with exponential qubit reduction, (ii) a measurement scheme requiring only $2n+1$ global settings to recover all amplitudes and relative phases, and (iii) explicit scaling showing the space-time-sampling volume can drop from $O(N^2)$ to $O((\log N)^3)$ for hardware-efficient implementations. This approach enables large, structured solid-state Hamiltonians to be simulated on substantially smaller quantum registers on near-term devices, enhancing the practical reach of variational quantum algorithms for one-particle models.

Abstract

Current and near-term quantum hardware is constrained by limited qubit counts, circuit depth, and the high cost of repeated measurements. We address these challenges for solid state Hamiltonians by introducing a logarithmic-qubit encoding that maps a system with $N$ physical sites onto only $\lceil \log_2 N \rceil$ qubits while maintaining a clear correspondence with the underlying physical model. Within this reduced register, we construct a compatible variational circuit and a Gray-code-inspired measurement strategy whose number of global settings grows only logarithmically with system size. To quantify the overall hardware load, we introduce a volumetric efficiency metric that combines the number of qubit, circuit depth, and the number of measurement settings into a single measure, expressing the overall computation costs. Using this metric, we show that the total space-time-sampling volume required in a variational loop can be reduced dramatically from $N^2$ to $(logN)^3$ for hardware efficient ansatz, allowing an exponential reduction in time and size of the quantum hardware. These results demonstrate that large, structured solid-state Hamiltonians can be simulated on substantially smaller quantum registers with controlled sampling overhead and manageable circuit complexity, extending the reach of variational quantum algorithms on near-term devices.

Efficient implementation of single particle Hamiltonians in exponentially reduced qubit space

TL;DR

The paper tackles the challenge of computing spectra for solid-state Hamiltonians on near-term quantum devices with limited qubits. It introduces a logarithmic-qubit encoding that maps an -site Hamiltonian to qubits, paired with a SES-based variational circuit and a Gray-code measurement protocol, underpinned by a volumetric efficiency metric. The key contributions are (i) a binary-encoded SES ansatz preserving the original parameterization with exponential qubit reduction, (ii) a measurement scheme requiring only global settings to recover all amplitudes and relative phases, and (iii) explicit scaling showing the space-time-sampling volume can drop from to for hardware-efficient implementations. This approach enables large, structured solid-state Hamiltonians to be simulated on substantially smaller quantum registers on near-term devices, enhancing the practical reach of variational quantum algorithms for one-particle models.

Abstract

Current and near-term quantum hardware is constrained by limited qubit counts, circuit depth, and the high cost of repeated measurements. We address these challenges for solid state Hamiltonians by introducing a logarithmic-qubit encoding that maps a system with physical sites onto only qubits while maintaining a clear correspondence with the underlying physical model. Within this reduced register, we construct a compatible variational circuit and a Gray-code-inspired measurement strategy whose number of global settings grows only logarithmically with system size. To quantify the overall hardware load, we introduce a volumetric efficiency metric that combines the number of qubit, circuit depth, and the number of measurement settings into a single measure, expressing the overall computation costs. Using this metric, we show that the total space-time-sampling volume required in a variational loop can be reduced dramatically from to for hardware efficient ansatz, allowing an exponential reduction in time and size of the quantum hardware. These results demonstrate that large, structured solid-state Hamiltonians can be simulated on substantially smaller quantum registers with controlled sampling overhead and manageable circuit complexity, extending the reach of variational quantum algorithms on near-term devices.
Paper Structure (19 sections, 31 equations, 6 figures, 2 tables)

This paper contains 19 sections, 31 equations, 6 figures, 2 tables.

Figures (6)

  • Figure 1: Circuit representation of the SES ansatz. The localized excitation is propagated across the register through a sequence of two-qubit entangling gates $\hat{A}_{j,j+1}$ acting on neighboring qubits.
  • Figure 2: Implementation of the $\hat{A}_{j,j+1}$ gate used in the SES ansatz. Each block is expressed in terms of three CNOTs and a sequence of parameterized single-qubit rotations $R_y$ and $R_z$.
  • Figure 3: Two concatenated modules of the subspace-constrained ansatz. In each module, a two-qubit gate $A$ acts on the flag–selector pair $(a_0,a_1)$, followed by a SWAP. Conditioned on the flag, the data register is prepared in $|i\rangle$ (Module 1) and $|i{+}1\rangle$ (Module 2), and a multi-controlled toffoli operation targets $a_1$.
  • Figure 4: Circular arrangement of the basis states $\ket{j},\ket{j+1},\ldots,\ket{j+7}$ used to extract phase differences. The blue edge shows the local relative phase $\delta\theta_j=\theta_{j+1}-\theta_j$, while the red arc illustrates the cumulative phase difference across multiple steps, $\theta_{j+4}-\theta_{j+2}=\sum_{r=2}^{3}(\theta_{j+r+1}-\theta_{j+r})$.
  • Figure 5: The protocol consists of quantum measurements to extract amplitudes and relative phases, followed by classical post-processing to reconstruct the total energy.
  • ...and 1 more figures