Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Laser intracavity absorption magnetometry for optical quantum sensing

J. M. Wollenberg, F. Perona, A. Palaci, H. Wenzel, H. Christopher, A. Knigge, W. Knolle, J. M. Bopp, T. Schröder

Abstract

Intracavity absorption spectroscopy (ICAS) is a well-established technique for detecting weak absorption signals with ultrahigh sensitivity. Here, we extend this concept to magnetometry using nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers in diamond. We introduce laser intracavity absorption magnetometry (LICAM), a concept that is in principle applicable to a broader class of optical quantum sensors, including optically pumped magnetometers. Using an electrically driven, edge-emitting diode laser that operates self-sustainably, we show that LICAM enables highly sensitive magnetometers operating under ambient conditions. Near the lasing threshold, we achieve a 475-fold enhancement in optical contrast and a 180-fold improvement in magnetic sensitivity compared with a conventional single-pass geometry. The experimental results are accurately described by a rate-equation model for single-mode diode lasers. From our measurements, we determine a projected shot-noise-limited sensitivity in the $\mathrm{pT}\,\mathrm{Hz}^{-1/2}$ range and show that, with realistic device improvements, sensitivities down to the $\mathrm{fT}\,\mathrm{Hz}^{-1/2}$ scale are attainable.

Laser intracavity absorption magnetometry for optical quantum sensing

Abstract

Intracavity absorption spectroscopy (ICAS) is a well-established technique for detecting weak absorption signals with ultrahigh sensitivity. Here, we extend this concept to magnetometry using nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers in diamond. We introduce laser intracavity absorption magnetometry (LICAM), a concept that is in principle applicable to a broader class of optical quantum sensors, including optically pumped magnetometers. Using an electrically driven, edge-emitting diode laser that operates self-sustainably, we show that LICAM enables highly sensitive magnetometers operating under ambient conditions. Near the lasing threshold, we achieve a 475-fold enhancement in optical contrast and a 180-fold improvement in magnetic sensitivity compared with a conventional single-pass geometry. The experimental results are accurately described by a rate-equation model for single-mode diode lasers. From our measurements, we determine a projected shot-noise-limited sensitivity in the range and show that, with realistic device improvements, sensitivities down to the scale are attainable.
Paper Structure (10 sections, 4 equations, 5 figures)

This paper contains 10 sections, 4 equations, 5 figures.

Figures (5)

  • Figure 1: (a) Schematic of the LICAM setup. An external-cavity diode laser (ECDL) provides optical gain at $1042\,$nm. A collimating lens (not shown) directs the edge emission through the diamond (D), which is optically pumped at $532\,$nm. The diamond is cut along the $[111]$ crystal axis (black arrow), which enables perfect cross-sectioning of the linearly polarized pump and probe beams with the $[111]$ NV$^-$ resonances. A coupling mirror (OC) closes the cavity, and the optical output power is detected by a photodiode (PD). Magnetic resonances are driven by MW radiation from the antenna (A). (b) Simplified NV$^-$ energy level scheme. The ground-state triplet manifold $^3\mathrm{A}_2$ is off-resonantly excited to the excited-state manifold $^3\mathrm{E}$, which fluoresces in red while predominantly preserving the spin state. An external magnetic field lifts the degeneracy of the Zeeman sublevels $\left|\pm1\right\rangle_\mathrm{m_S}$, allowing selective excitation by resonant MW fields of frequency $\nu$. From the excited state, these sublevels preferentially decay via nonradiative intersystem crossing into the singlet state $^1\mathrm{A}_1$, involving an optical transition at $1042\,$nm. Probing this transition enables optical detection of the magnetic resonances.
  • Figure 2: (a) Characteristic laser output curve of the LICAM sensor, showing a threshold at $116\,$mA (red dashed line). (b) LICAM configuration and ODMR trace. (c) Single-pass configuration and ODMR trace. ODMR trace in (b) and (c) of the $([111],-1_{\mathrm{m}_\mathrm{S}})$-resonance recorded at a relative gain current of $1.03$. (d) ODMR contrast as a function of normalized gain current. The gain is normalized to the respective lasing threshold. The solid dark-blue line in (a) represents a fit and in (d) represents a simulation based on a rate equation model for single-mode diode lasers. The dashed black line in (d) indicates the mean contrast value for the single-pass configuration.
  • Figure 3: (a) Shot-noise-limited sensitivity of the single-pass (grey) and LICAM (blue) configurations. The black dashed line represents a fit according to equation (\ref{['eq:snls']}). The solid blue line shows the result of a simulation (see sec. \ref{['sec:rateq']}), and the red dashed line marks the optical power at the lasing threshold. (b) Sensitivity measurement procedure: A $1\,$s long time series is recorded and Fourier transformed to obtain the noise floor for the on-resonant (blue) and off-resonant (grey) case. The noise-equivalent power bandwidth is indicated by a red dashed line, and the vertical line marks the shot-noise limit. This measurement corresponds to the circled datapoint in (a) and (c) for a relative gain of $1.18$. (c) Measured sensitivity versus gain current for the single-pass (grey) and LICAM (blue) configuration. Single-pass sensitivities were interpolated using a double-exponential decay (black dashed line) and multiplied by the simulated enhancement factor to obtain an estimate for the LICAM sensitivities (dark blue line).
  • Figure 4: (a) Simulation of the LICAM enhancement factor $\xi(I)$ with respect to the gain current $I$ for varying differential gain $g$. (b) Simulation of the shot-noise limited sensitivity $\eta$. The black markers highlight if the optimum values where achieved at the lasing threshold (star), above the threshold at the current limit of $I_\mathrm{c}=200\,$mA (plus) or if the treshold was not reached (triangle). $R_\mathrm{f}=0.8$, $a=20\,\text{m}^{-1}$. Other parameters as listed in the supplementary, TAB. I.
  • Figure 5: Simulated optimal values of the enhancement factor $\xi(I)$ and the SNLS $\eta(I)$ with a current limit of $I_\mathrm{c}=200\,$mA, with respect to the differential gain $g$ and the front facet reflectivity $R_\mathrm{f}$, using improved parameters (Supplementary TAB. I). (a), (b): Shot-noise limited sensitivity and (c), (d): Enhancement factor for $\Delta\alpha=20\,\text{m}^{-1}$ and $\Delta\alpha=0.01\,\text{m}^{-1}$, respectively. White contour lines indicate iso-levels, and the pale blue circles in (a) and (b) the optimum value. Hatchings indicate in which operating regime the optimum occurs: below the lasing threshold (horizontal lines), at the lasing threshold (dots), or at the current limit (diagonal lines). (e) Optimum SNLS as a function of the absorption constant $\Delta\alpha$ for different current limits. The marker shape indicates threshold operation (stars) or operation at the current limit (triangles).