Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Strict germs on normal surface singularities

Matteo Ruggiero

TL;DR

The paper studies strict holomorphic germs between normal surface singularities of topological degree $1$, proving that any such germ factors as $f=\\pi\\circ\\sigma$ with $\\pi$ a modification and $\\sigma$ a local isomorphism (a Kato germ). It provides two proofs of this decomposition: a local flattening approach and a valuation-theoretic method, and then uses these ideas to relate strict selfmaps to sandwiched singularities via Kato surfaces. A key result is that strict selfmaps occur precisely on sandwiched singularities, and the eigenvaluation associated to a strict selfmap cannot be divisorial; the work also develops the valuative dynamics on $\\mathcal{V}_X$ to control the orbits and deduce structural consequences. These methods connect birational geometry, non-Archimedean dynamics, and the geometry of Kato surfaces to classify selfsimilar normal surface singularities and to illuminate Nash-type resolution strategies.

Abstract

We show that any holomorphic germ $f \colon (X,x_0) \to (Y,y_0)$ of topological degree $1$ between normal surface singularities can be written as $f=π\circ σ$, where $π\colon Y' \to (Y,y_0)$ is a modification and $σ\colon (X,x_0) \to (Y',y_1)$ is a local isomorphism sending $x_0$ to a point $y_1 \in π^{-1}(y_0)$. A result by Fantini, Favre and myself guarantees that when $f$ is a selfmap, then $(X,x_0)$ is a sandwiched singularity. We give here an alternative proof based on the construction of the associated Kato surfaces, and valuative dynamics.

Strict germs on normal surface singularities

TL;DR

The paper studies strict holomorphic germs between normal surface singularities of topological degree , proving that any such germ factors as with a modification and a local isomorphism (a Kato germ). It provides two proofs of this decomposition: a local flattening approach and a valuation-theoretic method, and then uses these ideas to relate strict selfmaps to sandwiched singularities via Kato surfaces. A key result is that strict selfmaps occur precisely on sandwiched singularities, and the eigenvaluation associated to a strict selfmap cannot be divisorial; the work also develops the valuative dynamics on to control the orbits and deduce structural consequences. These methods connect birational geometry, non-Archimedean dynamics, and the geometry of Kato surfaces to classify selfsimilar normal surface singularities and to illuminate Nash-type resolution strategies.

Abstract

We show that any holomorphic germ of topological degree between normal surface singularities can be written as , where is a modification and is a local isomorphism sending to a point . A result by Fantini, Favre and myself guarantees that when is a selfmap, then is a sandwiched singularity. We give here an alternative proof based on the construction of the associated Kato surfaces, and valuative dynamics.
Paper Structure (32 sections, 17 theorems, 32 equations, 2 figures)

This paper contains 32 sections, 17 theorems, 32 equations, 2 figures.

Key Result

Theorem A

Let $f\colon (X,x_0) \to (Y,y_0)$ be a strict germ between two normal surface singularities. Then there exists a modification ${\pi}\colon Y' \to (Y,y_0)$, a point $y_1 \in {\pi}^{-1}(y_0)$, and a local isomorphism ${\sigma} \colon (X,x_0) \to (Y',y_1)$ so that $f={\pi} \circ {\sigma}$.

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: Example of a Kato datum on the quotient singularity of \ref{['ssec:strictnoeff']} seen as a sandwiched singularity. Self-intersections on curves are indicated for $Y'$, they are omitted for ($-1$)-curves.
  • Figure 2: Kato datum over the quotient singularity of type $\frac{1}{5k-3}(1,2k-1)$. The dashed curves are the critical curves and their strict transforms. On the right side, the associated Kato surface $S$. Self-intersections on curves are indicated for $Z$, $Z'$ and $S$, they are omitted for ($-1$)-curves.

Theorems & Definitions (48)

  • Theorem A
  • Theorem B
  • Definition 1.1
  • Definition 1.2
  • Remark 1.3
  • Remark 1.4
  • Remark 1.5
  • Proposition 2.1
  • Proposition 2.2: favre-jonsson:eigenval
  • Proposition 2.3: favre-jonsson:eigenval
  • ...and 38 more