Table of Contents
Fetching ...

The Time-Periodic Cahn-Hilliard-Gurtin System on the Half Space as a Mixed-Order System with General Boundary Conditions

Guillaume Neuttiens, Jonas Sauer

TL;DR

The paper develops a rigorous $L^2$-theory for the time-periodic CHG system in the half-space and reveals that classical Lopatinskiĭ–Shapiro conditions are insufficient for mixed-order systems. It introduces Newton-polygon-based potential spaces and a factorization of the CHG determinant to separate interior invertibility from boundary solvability, and proves maximal regularity and well-posedness results in the time-periodic setting. A novel complementing boundary condition is defined via an extended boundary matrix, ensuring solvability with general boundary data and providing trace theorems on Newton-polygon spaces. The results yield an isomorphism between natural solution and data spaces and establish precise boundary-trace criteria, with implications for boundary-value problems for mixed-order vector-valued systems. The methods offer a flexible framework for broader classes of time-periodic, boundary-coupled, mixed-order PDEs in unbounded domains.

Abstract

A well-posedness and maximal regularity result for the time-periodic Cahn-Hilliard-Gurtin system in the half space is proved. For this purpose, we introduce a novel class of complementing boundary conditions, extending the classical Lopatinskiĭ-Shapiro conditions from elliptic and parabolic theory to time-periodic mixed-order systems with general boundary conditions. Moreover, we show that the classical Lopatinskiĭ-Shapiro conditions are in general insufficient for well-posedness of mixed-order systems.

The Time-Periodic Cahn-Hilliard-Gurtin System on the Half Space as a Mixed-Order System with General Boundary Conditions

TL;DR

The paper develops a rigorous -theory for the time-periodic CHG system in the half-space and reveals that classical Lopatinskiĭ–Shapiro conditions are insufficient for mixed-order systems. It introduces Newton-polygon-based potential spaces and a factorization of the CHG determinant to separate interior invertibility from boundary solvability, and proves maximal regularity and well-posedness results in the time-periodic setting. A novel complementing boundary condition is defined via an extended boundary matrix, ensuring solvability with general boundary data and providing trace theorems on Newton-polygon spaces. The results yield an isomorphism between natural solution and data spaces and establish precise boundary-trace criteria, with implications for boundary-value problems for mixed-order vector-valued systems. The methods offer a flexible framework for broader classes of time-periodic, boundary-coupled, mixed-order PDEs in unbounded domains.

Abstract

A well-posedness and maximal regularity result for the time-periodic Cahn-Hilliard-Gurtin system in the half space is proved. For this purpose, we introduce a novel class of complementing boundary conditions, extending the classical Lopatinskiĭ-Shapiro conditions from elliptic and parabolic theory to time-periodic mixed-order systems with general boundary conditions. Moreover, we show that the classical Lopatinskiĭ-Shapiro conditions are in general insufficient for well-posedness of mixed-order systems.
Paper Structure (17 sections, 34 theorems, 166 equations, 3 figures)

This paper contains 17 sections, 34 theorems, 166 equations, 3 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $p\in (1,\infty)$. Consider the solution space $\mathbb{E}:=\mathbb{E}_1\times \mathbb{E}_2$, the data space $\mathbb{F}:=\mathbb{F}_1\times\mathbb{F}_2$, and the trace space $\mathbb{G}:=\mathbb{G}_1\times\mathbb{G}_2$, given by For all $f=(f_1, f_2)\in \mathbb{F}$ and $g=(g_1,g_2)\in \mathbb{G}$, system eqn: CHG_system_1 admits a unique solution $u=(u_1, u_2)\in\mathbb{E}$, and it holds wh

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: The Newton polygon of $D$, where $r_0=r_3=s_0=s_1=0$, $r_1=4$, $r_2=2$, and $s_2=s_3=1$.
  • Figure 2: The Newton polygons associated to the trace spaces of $\mu_D$.
  • Figure 3: The Newton polygons associated to certain spaces considered in the proof of Theorem \ref{['thm: main_2']}. Observe that $T_0(\mathcal{N}_{D^-})$ is a proper subset of $T_2(\mathcal{N}_D)$. In particular, we can choose $g\in H^{T_0(\mu_{D^-})}_\perp(G^{n-1})$ such that $g\notin H^{T_2(\mu_D)}_\perp(G^{n-1})$.

Theorems & Definitions (86)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Lemma 2.1
  • proof
  • Definition 2.2
  • Definition 2.3
  • Example 2.4
  • Definition 2.5
  • Lemma 2.6
  • Definition 2.7
  • ...and 76 more