Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Global strong solutions for non-isothermal compressible nematic liquid crystal flows under a scaling-invariant smallness condition

Lin Xu, Xin Zhong

TL;DR

This work studies the 3D non-isothermal compressible nematic liquid crystal system with vacuum in the far-field and proves global existence and uniqueness of strong solutions under a scaling-invariant smallness condition. A novel scaling-invariant quantity is identified, and a refined set of a priori estimates is developed to close a bootstrap argument without imposing the previously required viscosity constraint $2\mu>\lambda$. The analysis relies on new density bounds in $L^{\infty}_tL^3_x$, direct handling of the temperature equation to bound $\nabla\theta$, and careful control of the director field $d$ interactions. The result advances the theory by removing the viscosity restriction and clarifying the role of scaling-invariant quantities in governing global well-posedness for this coupled fluid-director system.

Abstract

We study the three-dimensional Cauchy problem for a non-isothermal compressible nematic liquid crystal system with far-field vacuum. By deriving refined energy estimates and exploiting the coupled structure of the equations, we establish the global existence and uniqueness of strong solutions, provided that the following scaling-invariant quantity is sufficiently small: $$ \big(1+\barρ+\tfrac{1}{\barρ}\big) \big[\|ρ_{0}\|_{L^{3}}+(\barρ^{2}+\barρ)\big(\|\sqrt{ρ_{0}}u_{0}\|_{L^{2}}^{2}+\|\nabla d_{0}\|_{L^{2}}^{2}\big)\big] \big[\|\nabla u_{0}\|_{L^{2}}^{2}+(\barρ+1)\|\sqrt{ρ_{0}}θ_{0}\|_{L^{2}}^{2} +\|\nabla^{2} d_{0}\|_{L^{2}}^{2}+\|\nabla d_{0}\|_{L^{4}}^{4}\big]. $$ In particular, our result identifies a new scaling-invariant quantity and does not impose additional restrictions on the viscosity coefficients, which improves previous work (Commun. Math. Sci. 21 (2023), 1455--1486).

Global strong solutions for non-isothermal compressible nematic liquid crystal flows under a scaling-invariant smallness condition

TL;DR

This work studies the 3D non-isothermal compressible nematic liquid crystal system with vacuum in the far-field and proves global existence and uniqueness of strong solutions under a scaling-invariant smallness condition. A novel scaling-invariant quantity is identified, and a refined set of a priori estimates is developed to close a bootstrap argument without imposing the previously required viscosity constraint . The analysis relies on new density bounds in , direct handling of the temperature equation to bound , and careful control of the director field interactions. The result advances the theory by removing the viscosity restriction and clarifying the role of scaling-invariant quantities in governing global well-posedness for this coupled fluid-director system.

Abstract

We study the three-dimensional Cauchy problem for a non-isothermal compressible nematic liquid crystal system with far-field vacuum. By deriving refined energy estimates and exploiting the coupled structure of the equations, we establish the global existence and uniqueness of strong solutions, provided that the following scaling-invariant quantity is sufficiently small: In particular, our result identifies a new scaling-invariant quantity and does not impose additional restrictions on the viscosity coefficients, which improves previous work (Commun. Math. Sci. 21 (2023), 1455--1486).
Paper Structure (3 sections, 12 theorems, 105 equations)

This paper contains 3 sections, 12 theorems, 105 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $q\in(3,6]$ and assume that the initial data $(\rho_{0}\ge 0,u_{0},\theta_{0}\ge 0,d_{0})$ satisfy and the compatibility condition for some $g_{1},g_{2} \in L^{2}(\mathbb{R}^{3})$. There exists a small positive constant $\varepsilon_{0}>0$ depending only on the parameters $R, \mu, \lambda, \kappa$, and $c_{v}$ but independent of the initial data, such that if then the Cauchy problem 1--4 ad

Theorems & Definitions (26)

  • Definition 1.1
  • Theorem 1.1
  • Remark 1.1
  • Remark 1.2
  • Remark 1.3
  • Lemma 2.1
  • Proposition 2.1
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.3
  • ...and 16 more