Text-Routed Sparse Mixture-of-Experts Model with Explanation and Temporal Alignment for Multi-Modal Sentiment Analysis
Dongning Rao, Yunbiao Zeng, Zhihua Jiang, Jujian Lv
TL;DR
The paper addresses multi-modal sentiment analysis by injecting explanations and temporal alignment into fusion across text, audio, and video. It introduces TEXT, a text-routed sparse mixture-of-experts model that uses multi-modal large language models to generate explanations, aligns audio and video with these explanations via a cross-attention mechanism, and employs a temporality-aware block to fuse modalities before a gate-fusion classifier outputs sentiment scores. TEXT achieves state-of-the-art performance across MOSI, MOSEI, CH-SIMS, and CH-SIMSv2, notably reducing MAE on CH-SIMS to 0.353 (approximately 13.5% better than baselines) and delivering strong Acc and F1 metrics on several datasets. The work highlights the value of explanations and temporal synchronization in robust MSA and suggests avenues to reduce accumulated errors from multiple MLLMs and extend the approach to multilingual settings.
Abstract
Human-interaction-involved applications underscore the need for Multi-modal Sentiment Analysis (MSA). Although many approaches have been proposed to address the subtle emotions in different modalities, the power of explanations and temporal alignments is still underexplored. Thus, this paper proposes the Text-routed sparse mixture-of-Experts model with eXplanation and Temporal alignment for MSA (TEXT). TEXT first augments explanations for MSA via Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLM), and then novelly aligns the epresentations of audio and video through a temporality-oriented neural network block. TEXT aligns different modalities with explanations and facilitates a new text-routed sparse mixture-of-experts with gate fusion. Our temporal alignment block merges the benefits of Mamba and temporal cross-attention. As a result, TEXT achieves the best performance cross four datasets among all tested models, including three recently proposed approaches and three MLLMs. TEXT wins on at least four metrics out of all six metrics. For example, TEXT decreases the mean absolute error to 0.353 on the CH-SIMS dataset, which signifies a 13.5% decrement compared with recently proposed approaches.
