Optimistic Feasible Search for Closed-Loop Fair Threshold Decision-Making
Wenzhang Du
TL;DR
The paper tackles learning a 1D threshold policy under demographic parity and optional service-rate constraints in a non-stationary, closed-loop setting. It introduces Optimistic Feasible Search (OFS), a grid-based, optimism-driven method that screens feasibility via confidence bounds and selects thresholds that maximize optimistic reward, falling back to minimizing optimistic constraint violation when necessary. Across a synthetic MVE-S and two semi-synthetic German Credit and COMPAS benchmarks, OFS consistently achieves higher tail utility with smaller cumulative constraint violations than unconstrained and primal–dual baselines, and approaches oracle performance on feasible fixed-threshold comparisons. The approach is interpretable, reproducible, and demonstrates promising applicability for fairness-aware decision-making in feedback-driven environments, with a clear path for extensions beyond 1D thresholds.
Abstract
Closed-loop decision-making systems (e.g., lending, screening, or recidivism risk assessment) often operate under fairness and service constraints while inducing feedback effects: decisions change who appears in the future, yielding non-stationary data and potentially amplifying disparities. We study online learning of a one-dimensional threshold policy from bandit feedback under demographic parity (DP) and, optionally, service-rate constraints. The learner observes only a scalar score each round and selects a threshold; reward and constraint residuals are revealed only for the chosen threshold. We propose Optimistic Feasible Search (OFS), a simple grid-based method that maintains confidence bounds for reward and constraint residuals for each candidate threshold. At each round, OFS selects a threshold that appears feasible under confidence bounds and, among those, maximizes optimistic reward; if no threshold appears feasible, OFS selects the threshold minimizing optimistic constraint violation. This design directly targets feasible high-utility thresholds and is particularly effective for low-dimensional, interpretable policy classes where discretization is natural. We evaluate OFS on (i) a synthetic closed-loop benchmark with stable contraction dynamics and (ii) two semi-synthetic closed-loop benchmarks grounded in German Credit and COMPAS, constructed by training a score model and feeding group-dependent acceptance decisions back into population composition. Across all environments, OFS achieves higher reward with smaller cumulative constraint violation than unconstrained and primal-dual bandit baselines, and is near-oracle relative to the best feasible fixed threshold under the same sweep procedure. Experiments are reproducible and organized with double-blind-friendly relative outputs.
