Table of Contents
Fetching ...

SoliReward: Mitigating Susceptibility to Reward Hacking and Annotation Noise in Video Generation Reward Models

Jiesong Lian, Ruizhe Zhong, Zixiang Zhou, Xiaoyue Mi, Yixue Hao, Yuan Zhou, Qinglin Lu, Long Hu, Junchi Yan

TL;DR

This work tackles post-training alignment of video generation with human preferences by addressing annotation noise, reward hacking, and limited RM architectures. It introduces SoliReward, combining low-noise single-item binary annotations, cross-prompt pairing, and the BT-WT loss with the HPQA reward-adapter to produce robust, multi-layered reward signals. Empirical results show stronger RM accuracy on in-domain and out-of-domain data and improved post-training performance when guiding video generators, with reduced vulnerability to reward hacking. The contributions include new data collection and labeling strategies, a novel loss function to regularize positive scores, and a hierarchical attention-based RM architecture, validated on physical plausibility, subject deformity, and semantic alignment benchmarks.

Abstract

Post-training alignment of video generation models with human preferences is a critical goal. Developing effective Reward Models (RMs) for this process faces significant methodological hurdles. Current data collection paradigms, reliant on in-prompt pairwise annotations, suffer from labeling noise. Concurrently, the architectural design of VLM-based RMs, particularly their output mechanisms, remains underexplored. Furthermore, RM is susceptible to reward hacking in post-training. To mitigate these limitations, we propose SoliReward, a systematic framework for video RM training. Our framework first sources high-quality, cost-efficient data via single-item binary annotations, then constructs preference pairs using a cross-prompt pairing strategy. Architecturally, we employ a Hierarchical Progressive Query Attention mechanism to enhance feature aggregation. Finally, we introduce a modified BT loss that explicitly accommodates win-tie scenarios. This approach regularizes the RM's score distribution for positive samples, providing more nuanced preference signals to alleviate over-focus on a small number of top-scoring samples. Our approach is validated on benchmarks evaluating physical plausibility, subject deformity, and semantic alignment, demonstrating improvements in direct RM evaluation metrics and in the efficacy of post-training on video generation models. Code and benchmark will be publicly available.

SoliReward: Mitigating Susceptibility to Reward Hacking and Annotation Noise in Video Generation Reward Models

TL;DR

This work tackles post-training alignment of video generation with human preferences by addressing annotation noise, reward hacking, and limited RM architectures. It introduces SoliReward, combining low-noise single-item binary annotations, cross-prompt pairing, and the BT-WT loss with the HPQA reward-adapter to produce robust, multi-layered reward signals. Empirical results show stronger RM accuracy on in-domain and out-of-domain data and improved post-training performance when guiding video generators, with reduced vulnerability to reward hacking. The contributions include new data collection and labeling strategies, a novel loss function to regularize positive scores, and a hierarchical attention-based RM architecture, validated on physical plausibility, subject deformity, and semantic alignment benchmarks.

Abstract

Post-training alignment of video generation models with human preferences is a critical goal. Developing effective Reward Models (RMs) for this process faces significant methodological hurdles. Current data collection paradigms, reliant on in-prompt pairwise annotations, suffer from labeling noise. Concurrently, the architectural design of VLM-based RMs, particularly their output mechanisms, remains underexplored. Furthermore, RM is susceptible to reward hacking in post-training. To mitigate these limitations, we propose SoliReward, a systematic framework for video RM training. Our framework first sources high-quality, cost-efficient data via single-item binary annotations, then constructs preference pairs using a cross-prompt pairing strategy. Architecturally, we employ a Hierarchical Progressive Query Attention mechanism to enhance feature aggregation. Finally, we introduce a modified BT loss that explicitly accommodates win-tie scenarios. This approach regularizes the RM's score distribution for positive samples, providing more nuanced preference signals to alleviate over-focus on a small number of top-scoring samples. Our approach is validated on benchmarks evaluating physical plausibility, subject deformity, and semantic alignment, demonstrating improvements in direct RM evaluation metrics and in the efficacy of post-training on video generation models. Code and benchmark will be publicly available.
Paper Structure (33 sections, 6 equations, 9 figures, 15 tables)

This paper contains 33 sections, 6 equations, 9 figures, 15 tables.

Figures (9)

  • Figure 1: Pipeline of SoliReward, our framework for data annotation and training of video reward models. (a) We introduce a single-item binary annotation method, coupled with a cross-prompt pairing strategy, to mitigate annotation noise. Furthermore, to alleviate reward hacking, we propose the Bradley-Terry with Win-Tie (BT-WT) loss. (b/c) We propose a novel VLM-based Reward Model (VLM-RM) architecture, featuring a Hierarchical Progressive Query Attention (HPQA) adapter. This adapter progressively aggregates multi-level representations from the VLM backbone to compute a robust reward score.
  • Figure 2: The reward score distributions on the semantic alignment task reveal that alternative architectures suffer from severe score clustering, assigning identical ratings to many samples.
  • Figure 3: Reward distribution for BT and BT-WT. BT-WT contributes to a more concentrated distribution in the high-score segment for positive samples.
  • Figure 4: Intra-group advantage distribution in BT-WT exhibits smaller advantages for top-ranked samples compared to BT, thereby mitigating the over-optimization.
  • Figure 5: Visual results guided by different reward models. From top to bottom: Baseline (HunyuanVideo), VideoAlign, and Ours.
  • ...and 4 more figures