The trinacria graphs $T_{(b+2)b2}$ are $e$-positive
Simon Y. M. Gong, David G. L. Wang, K. Zhang
TL;DR
The paper addresses the problem of identifying $e$-positive graphs within the Stanley--Stembridge framework by focusing on trinacria graphs $T_{abc}$ and proving $e$-positivity for the family $T_{(b+2)b2}$. The authors employ the composition method, decomposing $X_{T_{(b+2)b2}}$ into $X_G=Y_2e_1^2+Y_1e_1+Y_0$ and proving $e$-positivity of each $Y_i$ via tailored combinatorial techniques: a positive $e_I$-expansion for $Y_2$ using a term-pairing bijection; a charging argument for $Y_1$ with a structured partition of index sets; and a progressive repair scheme for $Y_0$ based on an involution on a negative set. These results yield a concrete, constructive verification of $e$-positivity for this trinacria family and endorse the sharpness of earlier threshold results by MS25. The work broadens the catalog of $e$-positive graphs beyond unit interval graphs and illustrates the utility of the composition method in complex graph families.
Abstract
In this paper, we identify a new family of $e$-positive graphs, called the trinacria graphs $T_{(b+2)b2}$, thereby providing a partial answer to Stanley's question on which graphs are $e$-positive. The trinacria graph $T_{abc}$ is the graph on $a+b+c+3$ vertices obtained by attaching paths $P_a$, $P_b$ and~$P_c$ to the vertices of a triangle, respectively. Our proof relies on several ad hoc combinatorial ideas, and employs divide-and-conquer techniques, charging arguments, and progressive repair methods.
